In search of the hidden path: The zero-encoding construction in satellite-framed English and verb-framed French

In this study, we examined the zero-encoding (ZE) strategy in motion event expression, where a manner verb combines with a locative prepositional phrase, leaving the path implicit (e.g., run in the room with the intended meaning ‘run into the room’). We analyzed 8000 instances of a comparable set of ten manner verbs in satellite-framed English and verb-framed French (4000 per language), each systematically paired with a containment (English: in , French: dans ‘in’) and a support preposition (English on , French sur ‘on’). We tested to what extent ZE is shaped by structural factors (language type) and by conceptual ones (preposition type, verb type, ground type). The results revealed striking crosslinguistic similarities, with comparable rates of ZE regardless of language type. Moreover, both languages were closely aligned in conceptual preferences: ZE occurred predominantly with directional manner verbs associated with movement along a spatial axis (e.g., ‘jump’, ‘run’), while it was virtually absent with pure manner verbs not inherently involving displacement (e.g., ‘dance’, ‘float’). It also showed a stronger association with bounded grounds with clearly defined boundaries (e.g., ‘room’, ‘table’) over unbounded ones with less sharply defined spatial limits (e.g., ‘desert’, ‘neighborhood’)—likely due to the relative ease of inferring a boundary-crossing path from the conceptual properties of manner and ground components. No systematic differences were found between containment and support relations in either language. Taken together, these findings suggest that ZE functions as a pragmatically anchored, typology-independent coding strategy that transcends the traditional satellite-versus verb-framing distinction. • Zero encoding occurs at similar rates across language types. • Zero encoding occurs more with directional than with pure manner verbs. • Zero encoding occurs more with bounded than with unbounded grounds. • Zero encoding shows no preference between containment and support events. • Zero encoding acts as a pragmatically grounded, typology-independent strategy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pragmatics
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2026.02.008
Primary Topic
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

In search of the hidden path: The zero-encoding construction in satellite-framed English and verb-framed French

Wojciech Lewandowski, Jan Fliessbach
Journal of Pragmatics
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
article

In search of the hidden path: The zero-encoding construction in satellite-framed English and verb-framed French

Wojciech Lewandowski, Jan Fliessbach
article en

Abstract

In this study, we examined the zero-encoding (ZE) strategy in motion event expression, where a manner verb combines with a locative prepositional phrase, leaving the path implicit (e.g., run in the room with the intended meaning ‘run into the room’). We analyzed 8000 instances of a comparable set of ten manner verbs in satellite-framed English and verb-framed French (4000 per language), each systematically paired with a containment (English: in , French: dans ‘in’) and a support preposition (English on , French sur ‘on’). We tested to what extent ZE is shaped by structural factors (language type) and by conceptual ones (preposition type, verb type, ground type). The results revealed striking crosslinguistic similarities, with comparable rates of ZE regardless of language type. Moreover, both languages were closely aligned in conceptual preferences: ZE occurred predominantly with directional manner verbs associated with movement along a spatial axis (e.g., ‘jump’, ‘run’), while it was virtually absent with pure manner verbs not inherently involving displacement (e.g., ‘dance’, ‘float’). It also showed a stronger association with bounded grounds with clearly defined boundaries (e.g., ‘room’, ‘table’) over unbounded ones with less sharply defined spatial limits (e.g., ‘desert’, ‘neighborhood’)—likely due to the relative ease of inferring a boundary-crossing path from the conceptual properties of manner and ground components. No systematic differences were found between containment and support relations in either language. Taken together, these findings suggest that ZE functions as a pragmatically anchored, typology-independent coding strategy that transcends the traditional satellite-versus verb-framing distinction. • Zero encoding occurs at similar rates across language types. • Zero encoding occurs more with directional than with pure manner verbs. • Zero encoding occurs more with bounded than with unbounded grounds. • Zero encoding shows no preference between containment and support events. • Zero encoding acts as a pragmatically grounded, typology-independent strategy.

Journal of PragmaticsVol. 259
University of Potsdam (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.