Contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in ultra-high sensitivity long-axial field-of-view lymphoma PET: amplified quantification problems?

PURPOSE: F]FDG PET leads to higher quantification inaccuracies when used in high-sensitivity LAFOV systems. This project aimed to assess the clinical feasibility of CE-CT for AC in LAFOV-PET for lymphoma patients. METHODS: F]FDG-PET for restaging with low dose AC-CT and diagnostic CE-CT were included in this retrospective analysis. PET images were reconstructed using ultra-high sensitivity (UHS) mode with CE-CT and AC-CT. Lesions and reference regions (liver and mediastinal blood pool (BP)) were evaluated. RESULTS: of lesions showed a similar magnitude of increase (5.97vs.5.68, p < 0.01, 5.80% median intra-lesion increase). The SUV-ratio of the lesions to reference organs decreased when CE-CT instead of AC-CT was used for AC (BP: 2.79vs.2.99, p < 0.01, median per-lesion decrease - 4.90%; liver: 1.85vs.1.97, p < 0.01, median per-lesion decrease - 2.64%). CONCLUSION: The use of CE-CT for AC of LAFOV-PET in UHS mode leads to higher SUV measurements. Also, lymphoma lesions show a consistent increase in uptake. The errors in the lesions seem higher than in conventional standard axial field-of-view PETs that use CE-CT for AC. Therefore, interpretation of borderline cases warrants attention to potential errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EJNMMI Physics
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-026-00866-4
Primary Topic
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in ultra-high sensitivity long-axial field-of-view lymphoma PET: amplified quantification problems?

Justin Ferdinandus, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Urban Novak, August Blomgren et al.
EJNMMI Physics
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
article

Contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in ultra-high sensitivity long-axial field-of-view lymphoma PET: amplified quantification problems?

Justin Ferdinandus, Foroud Aghapour Zangeneh, Urban Novak, August Blomgren, Alexander Weissensee, Hasan Sari, Michelle Celine Amon, Robert Seifert, Jan-Luca Penner, Shayan Acikgöz, Axel Rominger, Thomas Pabst, Clemens Mingels, Kuangyu Shi
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: F]FDG PET leads to higher quantification inaccuracies when used in high-sensitivity LAFOV systems. This project aimed to assess the clinical feasibility of CE-CT for AC in LAFOV-PET for lymphoma patients. METHODS: F]FDG-PET for restaging with low dose AC-CT and diagnostic CE-CT were included in this retrospective analysis. PET images were reconstructed using ultra-high sensitivity (UHS) mode with CE-CT and AC-CT. Lesions and reference regions (liver and mediastinal blood pool (BP)) were evaluated. RESULTS: of lesions showed a similar magnitude of increase (5.97vs.5.68, p < 0.01, 5.80% median intra-lesion increase). The SUV-ratio of the lesions to reference organs decreased when CE-CT instead of AC-CT was used for AC (BP: 2.79vs.2.99, p < 0.01, median per-lesion decrease - 4.90%; liver: 1.85vs.1.97, p < 0.01, median per-lesion decrease - 2.64%). CONCLUSION: The use of CE-CT for AC of LAFOV-PET in UHS mode leads to higher SUV measurements. Also, lymphoma lesions show a consistent increase in uptake. The errors in the lesions seem higher than in conventional standard axial field-of-view PETs that use CE-CT for AC. Therefore, interpretation of borderline cases warrants attention to potential errors.

EJNMMI Physics
University of Bern (CH), University of Cologne (DE), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Düsseldorf University Hospital (DE), University Hospital Cologne (DE), Siemens (Switzerland) (CH), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.