Between Flow and Friction: Regulating Health Data Flows in India’s National Digital Health Ecosystem

Digital health infrastructures, such as India’s National Digital Health Ecosystem (NDHE), are touted as the panacea for improving universal healthcare, particularly in the Global South. Central to this infrastructure is the generation and circulation of health data, i.e. digital data relating to any facet of health. This article offers two critical analyses of the NDHE – first, the centrality of the ‘flow’ of health data to enable monetisation of these data flows by commercial actors (and consequently, the commercialisation of health), and second, the ways in which this market-driven imaginary of the NDHE reshapes principles of data governance such as informed consent and impact assessments into negative frictions for health data flows. Finally, this article instead offers suggestions on how to implement these legal principles through friction-in-design regulations, to engineer a necessary ‘drag’ to limit the commodification of health data flows in the NDHE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Law Technology and Humans
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/lthj.3987
Primary Topic
ICT in Developing Communities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Flow and Friction: Regulating Health Data Flows in India’s National Digital Health Ecosystem

Ramya Chandrasekhar
Law Technology and Humans
ICT in Developing Communities
article

Between Flow and Friction: Regulating Health Data Flows in India’s National Digital Health Ecosystem

Ramya Chandrasekhar
article en

Abstract

Digital health infrastructures, such as India’s National Digital Health Ecosystem (NDHE), are touted as the panacea for improving universal healthcare, particularly in the Global South. Central to this infrastructure is the generation and circulation of health data, i.e. digital data relating to any facet of health. This article offers two critical analyses of the NDHE – first, the centrality of the ‘flow’ of health data to enable monetisation of these data flows by commercial actors (and consequently, the commercialisation of health), and second, the ways in which this market-driven imaginary of the NDHE reshapes principles of data governance such as informed consent and impact assessments into negative frictions for health data flows. Finally, this article instead offers suggestions on how to implement these legal principles through friction-in-design regulations, to engineer a necessary ‘drag’ to limit the commodification of health data flows in the NDHE.

Law Technology and HumansVol. 8(1)
Centre for Internet and Society (IN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
ICT in Developing Communities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.