Validation of Long-Term Methane (CH4) Satellite Measurements from the AIRS Spectrometer and Correction of Their Temporal Drift

The study aims to develop a methodology for identifying and correcting drift in the quality of orbital data to improve the accuracy of long-term trend estimates and enhance the representativeness of orbital monitoring. We establish the presence of unidirectional, statistically significant drift in the difference between satellite instrument readings and ground-based observations. We compare the last two versions of methane (CH4) measurements from the Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS)—specifically, Level 3 versions 6 and 7 (“IR-AIRS Only”)—with data from 18 ground-based stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) and 11 stations of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) for the 2003–2022 period. We determine that adjusting ground-based measurement data to sea level using the barometric formula, which is a necessary step for proper validation, results in significant errors, especially at high altitudes. It is proposed that such an adjustment should be based on pressure measured directly at a station. Implementing this over the examined period, we determine that the residual drift of the satellite spectrometer (Satellite Spectrometer Drift or SSD) is negative and equal to 1.64 × 1014 molecules/cm2 per day or 7.62 × 10−6 ppm per day for AIRS v6 and 7.20 × 10−6 ppm per day for AIRS v7. The correction implementation significantly improves the correspondence between AIRS v6 and v7 methane data and NDACC data, resulting in close estimates of methane trends from satellite and ground-based measurements. The robustness of the proposed correction has been demonstrated by the improvement in the consistency of station-by-station trend estimates obtained for corrected AIRS data and independent TCCON ground-based observations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081162
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of Long-Term Methane (CH4) Satellite Measurements from the AIRS Spectrometer and Correction of Their Temporal Drift

А. И. Скороход, Vadim Rakitin, А. V. Chernokulsky, E. I. Fedorova
Remote Sensing
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Validation of Long-Term Methane (CH4) Satellite Measurements from the AIRS Spectrometer and Correction of Their Temporal Drift

А. И. Скороход, Vadim Rakitin, А. V. Chernokulsky, E. I. Fedorova
article en

Abstract

The study aims to develop a methodology for identifying and correcting drift in the quality of orbital data to improve the accuracy of long-term trend estimates and enhance the representativeness of orbital monitoring. We establish the presence of unidirectional, statistically significant drift in the difference between satellite instrument readings and ground-based observations. We compare the last two versions of methane (CH4) measurements from the Atmospheric InfraRed Sounder (AIRS)—specifically, Level 3 versions 6 and 7 (“IR-AIRS Only”)—with data from 18 ground-based stations of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) and 11 stations of the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) for the 2003–2022 period. We determine that adjusting ground-based measurement data to sea level using the barometric formula, which is a necessary step for proper validation, results in significant errors, especially at high altitudes. It is proposed that such an adjustment should be based on pressure measured directly at a station. Implementing this over the examined period, we determine that the residual drift of the satellite spectrometer (Satellite Spectrometer Drift or SSD) is negative and equal to 1.64 × 1014 molecules/cm2 per day or 7.62 × 10−6 ppm per day for AIRS v6 and 7.20 × 10−6 ppm per day for AIRS v7. The correction implementation significantly improves the correspondence between AIRS v6 and v7 methane data and NDACC data, resulting in close estimates of methane trends from satellite and ground-based measurements. The robustness of the proposed correction has been demonstrated by the improvement in the consistency of station-by-station trend estimates obtained for corrected AIRS data and independent TCCON ground-based observations.

Remote SensingVol. 18(8)
University of Vienna (AT), Institute of Geography (RU), A.M. Obukhov Institute of Atmospheric Physics (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.