From microscopy to antimicrobial decisions: a clinically grounded roadmap for critical care infectious diseases

In the intensive care unit (ICU), antibiotics often begin under extreme uncertainty. Fever, leukocytosis, hypotension, and organ dysfunction may signal bacterial infection, but the same findings are common with aspiration, post-operative inflammation, drug reactions, or sterile systemic inflammation. Cultures take time and their yield falls after antibiotics. Rapid molecular tests and metagenomics can add actionable information, but they also raise the burden of interpreting complex results. Microscopy is one of the few inputs that can shift management within minutes to hours: Gram-stain patterns from positive blood-culture bottles, respiratory specimens, cerebrospinal fluid, and wound material can reshape initial coverage and support early de-escalation when negative. Tissue and cytology help distinguish invasion from key mimics. The gap is consistency-reads vary across observers, workflows differ, and results do not always translate into reliable bedside actions. This review focuses on infectious-disease artificial intelligence (AI) as ICU bedside decision support, rather than as a survey of models. Using ICU sepsis as the primary use case-and neurocritical care as a challenging setting where sedation, brain injury, and noninfectious inflammation often mimic infection-we separate evidence into pathogen signals and host-response signals. We then map both streams to six decisions over the first 72 hours: start now versus pause, choose initial spectrum, reassess and narrow, escalate diagnostics and source control, act on high-risk resistance or invasive pathogens, and stop safely. We summarize where AI is most credible today (Gram-stain assistance, culture-plate triage, urine-culture screening, infection-focused digital pathology, host-response classifiers, and selected metagenomics) and what makes outputs actionable: calibrated probabilities, explicit confidence with safe deferral when uncertain, validation across hospitals and instruments, and endpoints tied to stewardship and safety (time to appropriate therapy, antibiotic days, de-escalation within 72 hours, missed bacteremia). Evidence was updated through February 28, 2026.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2026.1807400
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From microscopy to antimicrobial decisions: a clinically grounded roadmap for critical care infectious diseases

Huiling Qu, Shida Yang, Jia‐Nan Li, Yang Gao et al.
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

From microscopy to antimicrobial decisions: a clinically grounded roadmap for critical care infectious diseases

Huiling Qu, Shida Yang, Jia‐Nan Li, Yang Gao, Xiaobin Zhang, Xi-Meng Xu
article en

Abstract

In the intensive care unit (ICU), antibiotics often begin under extreme uncertainty. Fever, leukocytosis, hypotension, and organ dysfunction may signal bacterial infection, but the same findings are common with aspiration, post-operative inflammation, drug reactions, or sterile systemic inflammation. Cultures take time and their yield falls after antibiotics. Rapid molecular tests and metagenomics can add actionable information, but they also raise the burden of interpreting complex results. Microscopy is one of the few inputs that can shift management within minutes to hours: Gram-stain patterns from positive blood-culture bottles, respiratory specimens, cerebrospinal fluid, and wound material can reshape initial coverage and support early de-escalation when negative. Tissue and cytology help distinguish invasion from key mimics. The gap is consistency-reads vary across observers, workflows differ, and results do not always translate into reliable bedside actions. This review focuses on infectious-disease artificial intelligence (AI) as ICU bedside decision support, rather than as a survey of models. Using ICU sepsis as the primary use case-and neurocritical care as a challenging setting where sedation, brain injury, and noninfectious inflammation often mimic infection-we separate evidence into pathogen signals and host-response signals. We then map both streams to six decisions over the first 72 hours: start now versus pause, choose initial spectrum, reassess and narrow, escalate diagnostics and source control, act on high-risk resistance or invasive pathogens, and stop safely. We summarize where AI is most credible today (Gram-stain assistance, culture-plate triage, urine-culture screening, infection-focused digital pathology, host-response classifiers, and selected metagenomics) and what makes outputs actionable: calibrated probabilities, explicit confidence with safe deferral when uncertain, validation across hospitals and instruments, and endpoints tied to stewardship and safety (time to appropriate therapy, antibiotic days, de-escalation within 72 hours, missed bacteremia). Evidence was updated through February 28, 2026.

Frontiers in Artificial IntelligenceVol. 9
Liaoning Provincial People's Hospital (CN), Command Hospital (IN)
Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.