Seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and compensated cirrhosis: Efficacy and safety from RESPONSE and ASSURE studies

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and cirrhosis. Seladelpar, a first-in-class delpar (selective PPAR-δ agonist), had generally similar efficacy and safety among patients with versus without compensated cirrhosis in the phase 3 RESPONSE study. Here we provide additional data on seladelpar in patients with compensated cirrhosis from the phase 3 program. METHODS: In RESPONSE, patients with PBC and an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA were randomized 2:1 to seladelpar 10 mg or placebo for 1 year. Upon completion, patients rolled over into the open-label (seladelpar 10 mg) phase 3 ASSURE study, which also enrolled patients from earlier seladelpar legacy PBC studies. Here, we assessed the composite endpoint [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) <1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP decrease ≥15%, and total bilirubin ≤ULN], other laboratory changes, and safety in all patients with cirrhosis from RESPONSE and an interim analysis of the ongoing ASSURE study through January 2024. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with compensated cirrhosis enrolled in RESPONSE (18 seladelpar, 9 placebo). At month 12, 38.9% and 22.2% of patients in the seladelpar and placebo groups, respectively, met the composite endpoint; mean percent change from baseline in ALP was -37.1% and -10.1%, respectively. Upon rollover to ASSURE (13 seladelpar, 6 placebo), ALP declines were maintained for up to 18 months. An additional 35 patients with compensated cirrhosis in ASSURE from legacy studies had similar reductions in ALP with up to 2 years of treatment. Bilirubin remained overall stable. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Variceal bleeding and/or ascites developed in 3 patients after ≥9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Seladelpar decreased markers of cholestasis and was overall safe and well-tolerated in patients with PBC and compensated cirrhosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hepatology Communications
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/hc9.0000000000000918
Primary Topic
Liver Diseases and Immunity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and compensated cirrhosis: Efficacy and safety from RESPONSE and ASSURE studies

Ziad Younes, George Ν. Dalekos, John M. Vierling, Daria B. Crittenden et al.
Hepatology Communications
Liver Diseases and Immunity
article

Seladelpar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and compensated cirrhosis: Efficacy and safety from RESPONSE and ASSURE studies

Ziad Younes, George Ν. Dalekos, John M. Vierling, Daria B. Crittenden, Adam Vašura, Christopher L. Bowlus, Stuart C. Gordon, Cynthia Levy, F. Nevens, Joost P.H. Drenth, Ira M. Jacobson, Alejandra Villamil, Eric Lawitz, Mordechai Rabinovitz, Susheela Carroll, Ulrike Morgera, Yan Chun Zhou, Marina G. Silveira, A Galli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment options are limited for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and cirrhosis. Seladelpar, a first-in-class delpar (selective PPAR-δ agonist), had generally similar efficacy and safety among patients with versus without compensated cirrhosis in the phase 3 RESPONSE study. Here we provide additional data on seladelpar in patients with compensated cirrhosis from the phase 3 program. METHODS: In RESPONSE, patients with PBC and an inadequate response or intolerance to UDCA were randomized 2:1 to seladelpar 10 mg or placebo for 1 year. Upon completion, patients rolled over into the open-label (seladelpar 10 mg) phase 3 ASSURE study, which also enrolled patients from earlier seladelpar legacy PBC studies. Here, we assessed the composite endpoint [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) <1.67×upper limit of normal (ULN), ALP decrease ≥15%, and total bilirubin ≤ULN], other laboratory changes, and safety in all patients with cirrhosis from RESPONSE and an interim analysis of the ongoing ASSURE study through January 2024. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with compensated cirrhosis enrolled in RESPONSE (18 seladelpar, 9 placebo). At month 12, 38.9% and 22.2% of patients in the seladelpar and placebo groups, respectively, met the composite endpoint; mean percent change from baseline in ALP was -37.1% and -10.1%, respectively. Upon rollover to ASSURE (13 seladelpar, 6 placebo), ALP declines were maintained for up to 18 months. An additional 35 patients with compensated cirrhosis in ASSURE from legacy studies had similar reductions in ALP with up to 2 years of treatment. Bilirubin remained overall stable. No treatment-related serious adverse events occurred. Variceal bleeding and/or ascites developed in 3 patients after ≥9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Seladelpar decreased markers of cholestasis and was overall safe and well-tolerated in patients with PBC and compensated cirrhosis.

Hepatology CommunicationsVol. 10(5)
University of Miami (US), The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Wayne State University (US), University of Ostrava (CZ), Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (AR), Yale University (US), University Hospital Ostrava (CZ), University Hospital of Larissa (GR), Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT), Pusan National University Hospital (KR), Gastro One (United States) (US), Texas Liver Institute (US), Gilead Sciences (United States) (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), New York University (US), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University of California, Davis (US), Michigan State University (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Gilead Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Liver Diseases and Immunity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.