Recycled Denim and Polyurethane Foam for Building Insulation and Resource Conservation

Construction industry remains a major driver of global resource use and waste generation, therefore, identifying sustainable material alternatives is increasingly important. Recycled-textile-based insulation presents a promising pathway to support circular economy principles by diverting post-consumer waste from landfills and reducing reliance on virgin petrochemical materials. This study conducts a cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment (LCA) using SimaPro to compare polyurethane (PU) foam and recycled denim (cotton fiber) insulation. The system boundary includes raw material extraction, transportation, and manufacturing. A functional unit of 1 m2 of installed insulation with a thermal resistance of RSI = 1 m2·K/W at the factory gate ensures comparability, with mass-based results reported as secondary metrics. The results indicate that recycled denim exhibits higher embodied carbon per unit mass, despite lower production energy and lower cradle-to-gate impacts per installed area, reinforcing the need for a declared-unit-based comparison tied to thermal performance. Air leakage is evaluated separately as a complementary performance indicator influencing in-service energy behavior showing significantly lower air leakage for PU; but is not included in the cradle-to-gate normalization. However, it could be argued that materials with improved airtightness may enable the use of reduced insulation thickness while still achieving equivalent performance, thereby potentially lowering overall material demand. Nevertheless, recycled denim offers environmental advantages by reducing landfill waste and promoting resource conservation through material reuse. A transient coupled heat–moisture model in COMSOL Multiphysics, using climate data from Arizona and Florida, further reveals that denim absorbs more moisture than polyurethane. This leads to larger heat flux fluctuations, highlighting a trade-off between denim’s sustainability advantages and its reduced hygrothermal durability. Overall, these findings demonstrate the limitations of single-metric comparisons and emphasize the need for performance-based, multi-criteria assessments that integrate functional efficiency with circularity. Future research should incorporate occupant health and comfort to enable a more comprehensive evaluation of insulation sustainability.