Comparability of precipitation water, soil, and kale plants as deposition samplers for quantification of airborne pesticide deposition

Airborne pesticide transport and deposition are insufficiently studied sources of environmental pollution. A controlled experiment was conducted to examine and compare airborne deposition of pesticides in precipitation, on soil and plants. Ten relevant pesticides were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with limits of quantification in the low ng/L or ng/kg range. The field experiment was performed over a 28-day period in summer 2024, including a bulk sampler, a reference soil, and bioindicator plants (kale) for uptake of substances from the gas phase and deposition. Sample analysis showed that the deposited amounts were in the low ng/L or ng/kg range and could only be quantified with highly sensitive analytical methods. For comparison and interpretation of the compartments precipitation, soil (including percolate), and kale, concentrations were converted into ng/m 2 deposition amounts by relation to their collection surface. Deposition reached up to 13,762 ng/m 2 in the bulk sampler (propamocarb), 2,571 ng/m 2 in the soil compartment (terbuthylazine-desethyl), and 1,231 ng/m 2 in the kale compartment (terbuthylazine). The bulk sampler had 1.4 to 106 times higher deposition values than the other samplers and was found most suitable and conservative for estimating airborne pesticide deposition. These investigations provide a basis for future national monitoring of airborne pesticides in Germany and can be applied to other monitoring campaigns. The selected analytes covered a large range of chemical-physical properties of approved pesticides. These results support the estimation of pesticide residues by deposition in different environmental compartments for ecotoxicological risk assessment and estimation of crop residues for consumer protection. • Airborne pesticide deposition is a relevant source of environmental contamination • Bulk samplers, soil and kale were compared as suitable deposition samplers • A 28-day field trial in Germany was performed to quantify pesticide deposition • Analytical methods were developed for trace analysis in the ng/L or ng/kg range • Bulk samplers were found the most conservative deposition samplers

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2026.103019
Primary Topic
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparability of precipitation water, soil, and kale plants as deposition samplers for quantification of airborne pesticide deposition

Stefan Rhiem, A.J. Peters, Katja Hombrecher, Achim Gathmann et al.
Atmospheric Pollution Research
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
article

Comparability of precipitation water, soil, and kale plants as deposition samplers for quantification of airborne pesticide deposition

Stefan Rhiem, A.J. Peters, Katja Hombrecher, Achim Gathmann, Benedikt Ringbeck, Roland Kubiak, Bernd Göckener
article en

Abstract

Airborne pesticide transport and deposition are insufficiently studied sources of environmental pollution. A controlled experiment was conducted to examine and compare airborne deposition of pesticides in precipitation, on soil and plants. Ten relevant pesticides were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with limits of quantification in the low ng/L or ng/kg range. The field experiment was performed over a 28-day period in summer 2024, including a bulk sampler, a reference soil, and bioindicator plants (kale) for uptake of substances from the gas phase and deposition. Sample analysis showed that the deposited amounts were in the low ng/L or ng/kg range and could only be quantified with highly sensitive analytical methods. For comparison and interpretation of the compartments precipitation, soil (including percolate), and kale, concentrations were converted into ng/m 2 deposition amounts by relation to their collection surface. Deposition reached up to 13,762 ng/m 2 in the bulk sampler (propamocarb), 2,571 ng/m 2 in the soil compartment (terbuthylazine-desethyl), and 1,231 ng/m 2 in the kale compartment (terbuthylazine). The bulk sampler had 1.4 to 106 times higher deposition values than the other samplers and was found most suitable and conservative for estimating airborne pesticide deposition. These investigations provide a basis for future national monitoring of airborne pesticides in Germany and can be applied to other monitoring campaigns. The selected analytes covered a large range of chemical-physical properties of approved pesticides. These results support the estimation of pesticide residues by deposition in different environmental compartments for ecotoxicological risk assessment and estimation of crop residues for consumer protection. • Airborne pesticide deposition is a relevant source of environmental contamination • Bulk samplers, soil and kale were compared as suitable deposition samplers • A 28-day field trial in Germany was performed to quantify pesticide deposition • Analytical methods were developed for trace analysis in the ng/L or ng/kg range • Bulk samplers were found the most conservative deposition samplers

Atmospheric Pollution Research
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (DE), Climate Analytics (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology (DE), Oldham Council (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.