Postoperative Muscle Loss and Preoperative Sarcopenia Predict Survival and Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization for Spinal Metastases: A Longitudinal CT-Morphometric Analysis of 285 Patients

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sarcopenia is associated with adverse outcomes in oncologic populations, yet the postoperative trajectory of skeletal muscle following spine surgery for metastatic disease remains poorly characterized. PURPOSE: To quantify postoperative changes in CT-based body composition after surgical stabilization for spinal metastases and to evaluate the prognostic impact of preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative muscle decline. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary spine center (2016-2024). PATIENT SAMPLE: 285 adults undergoing surgical stabilization for spinal metastases with preoperative CT (tCT1) and routine follow-up CT at approximately 9 months (tCT2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, length of stay, postoperative complications, ECOG performance status, and CT-based morphometric parameters at L3 (SMI, PSMI, PMI, VAT, SMD). METHODS: CT morphometry was performed using standardized protocols. Preoperative sarcopenia was defined using validated sex-specific SMI thresholds. ROC analysis identified ≥15% postoperative SMI decline as the optimal survival-related cutoff. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical and oncologic covariates. A non-oncologic fracture cohort undergoing lumbar stabilization was included to differentiate surgery-related muscle loss from cancer-related systemic catabolism. RESULTS: Skeletal muscle mass and quality declined substantially after surgery, particularly following lumbar stabilization. Minimally invasive procedures were associated with significantly less muscle loss than open approaches (SMI decline -24% vs. -40%, p<0.0001). Compared with fracture controls, metastatic patients demonstrated markedly greater losses in muscle indices and a distinct pattern of visceral fat depletion. An SMI decline ≥15% independently predicted reduced survival (median 284 vs. 730 days; HR 4.78) and poorer functional status. Preoperative sarcopenia, present in one-third of patients, also independently predicted mortality (HR 4.01), prolonged hospitalization, and higher complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative skeletal muscle loss after stabilization for spinal metastases is frequent and clinically meaningful. Both preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative SMI decline independently predict survival, supporting routine morphometric assessment and the adoption of muscle-sparing surgical and rehabilitation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Spine Journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2026.04.019
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Muscle Loss and Preoperative Sarcopenia Predict Survival and Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization for Spinal Metastases: A Longitudinal CT-Morphometric Analysis of 285 Patients

Moritz Lenz, Julian Kylies, Markus Schomacher, Marc Dreimann et al.
The Spine Journal
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Postoperative Muscle Loss and Preoperative Sarcopenia Predict Survival and Morbidity After Surgical Stabilization for Spinal Metastases: A Longitudinal CT-Morphometric Analysis of 285 Patients

Moritz Lenz, Julian Kylies, Markus Schomacher, Marc Dreimann, Lennart Viezens, Peter Obid, Malte Schroeder, Elias Brauneck, Leon-Gordian Leonhardt
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Sarcopenia is associated with adverse outcomes in oncologic populations, yet the postoperative trajectory of skeletal muscle following spine surgery for metastatic disease remains poorly characterized. PURPOSE: To quantify postoperative changes in CT-based body composition after surgical stabilization for spinal metastases and to evaluate the prognostic impact of preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative muscle decline. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective cohort study at a tertiary spine center (2016-2024). PATIENT SAMPLE: 285 adults undergoing surgical stabilization for spinal metastases with preoperative CT (tCT1) and routine follow-up CT at approximately 9 months (tCT2). OUTCOME MEASURES: Overall survival, length of stay, postoperative complications, ECOG performance status, and CT-based morphometric parameters at L3 (SMI, PSMI, PMI, VAT, SMD). METHODS: CT morphometry was performed using standardized protocols. Preoperative sarcopenia was defined using validated sex-specific SMI thresholds. ROC analysis identified ≥15% postoperative SMI decline as the optimal survival-related cutoff. Multivariable Cox models adjusted for clinical and oncologic covariates. A non-oncologic fracture cohort undergoing lumbar stabilization was included to differentiate surgery-related muscle loss from cancer-related systemic catabolism. RESULTS: Skeletal muscle mass and quality declined substantially after surgery, particularly following lumbar stabilization. Minimally invasive procedures were associated with significantly less muscle loss than open approaches (SMI decline -24% vs. -40%, p<0.0001). Compared with fracture controls, metastatic patients demonstrated markedly greater losses in muscle indices and a distinct pattern of visceral fat depletion. An SMI decline ≥15% independently predicted reduced survival (median 284 vs. 730 days; HR 4.78) and poorer functional status. Preoperative sarcopenia, present in one-third of patients, also independently predicted mortality (HR 4.01), prolonged hospitalization, and higher complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative skeletal muscle loss after stabilization for spinal metastases is frequent and clinically meaningful. Both preoperative sarcopenia and postoperative SMI decline independently predict survival, supporting routine morphometric assessment and the adoption of muscle-sparing surgical and rehabilitation strategies.

The Spine Journal
Universität Hamburg (DE), University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.