AI-Driven Performance Monitoring and Employee Psychological Well-being: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis (2000–2026)

The swiftness with which artificial intelligence (AI) has been integrated into the performance management in the workplace has significantly changed the way it is that organizations monitor and assess the effectiveness of the employees. Although the use of AI-enhanced performance monitoring systems can help in efficiency, objectivity, and decision making based on information, it presents such severe issues as the mental well-being of employees. Applying the bibliometric and science mapping methods based on the Human Capital Theory, Technostress Theory, and Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory, this paper found 350 documents on the intellectual structure of AI-based monitoring and its effects on employee well-being published between 2000 and 2026. After going through the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 221 studies that met the requirements of the method were picked to be analyzed finally. The performance analysis and science mapping (co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and co-citation analysis) as bibliometric methods were performed with the help of VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to identify important tendencies, themes, and research clusters. It appeared that scholarly interest in AI-driven monitoring increased substantially after 2018. Nonetheless, the perceived transparency and organizational support are moderating factors that help to reduce these negative impacts, and this study has filled the knowledge gap by bringing together the bibliometric analysis with the systematic review model due to its extensive intellectual framework coverage in the field. It incorporates useful information that organizations can use to strike a balance between technological efficiency and human well-being by implementing AI ethically and in a supportive working environment. The paper also highlights the main research gaps and provides the guidelines to future empirical research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202623005002/pdf
Primary Topic
Technostress in Professional Settings
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-Driven Performance Monitoring and Employee Psychological Well-being: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis (2000–2026)

Surabhi Prakash Dixit, Aniket Godse, Smruti Patre
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Technostress in Professional Settings
article

AI-Driven Performance Monitoring and Employee Psychological Well-being: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis (2000–2026)

Surabhi Prakash Dixit, Aniket Godse, Smruti Patre
article en

Abstract

The swiftness with which artificial intelligence (AI) has been integrated into the performance management in the workplace has significantly changed the way it is that organizations monitor and assess the effectiveness of the employees. Although the use of AI-enhanced performance monitoring systems can help in efficiency, objectivity, and decision making based on information, it presents such severe issues as the mental well-being of employees. Applying the bibliometric and science mapping methods based on the Human Capital Theory, Technostress Theory, and Conservation of Resources (COR) Theory, this paper found 350 documents on the intellectual structure of AI-based monitoring and its effects on employee well-being published between 2000 and 2026. After going through the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 221 studies that met the requirements of the method were picked to be analyzed finally. The performance analysis and science mapping (co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence, and co-citation analysis) as bibliometric methods were performed with the help of VOSviewer and Biblioshiny to identify important tendencies, themes, and research clusters. It appeared that scholarly interest in AI-driven monitoring increased substantially after 2018. Nonetheless, the perceived transparency and organizational support are moderating factors that help to reduce these negative impacts, and this study has filled the knowledge gap by bringing together the bibliometric analysis with the systematic review model due to its extensive intellectual framework coverage in the field. It incorporates useful information that organizations can use to strike a balance between technological efficiency and human well-being by implementing AI ethically and in a supportive working environment. The paper also highlights the main research gaps and provides the guidelines to future empirical research.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Technostress in Professional Settings
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.