Association of insulin resistance and positive coronary artery remodeling and plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Positive coronary remodeling (PR) and increased plaque burden (PB) are imaging markers of vulnerable coronary plaque. This study evaluated the association of insulin resistance (IR), assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), with PR and PB in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We retrospectively included ACS patients who underwent IVUS-guided revascularization at a single center (December 2020 to December 2021). IR positivity was defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. IVUS was used to measure external elastic membrane (EEM) and lumen areas at the target lesion and reference segments. The remodeling index (RI) was calculated as target-lesion EEM area divided by the mean EEM area of proximal and distal reference segments. PR was defined as RI > 1.05, negative remodeling as RI < 0.95, and intermediate remodeling as 0.95–1.05. PB was calculated automatically by the IVUS system as (vessel area − lumen area)/vessel area. PB and remodeling analyses were lesion-level (111 lesions from 98 patients). Logistic regression for PR used patient-clustered robust standard errors. A total of 98 ACS patients (111 target lesions) were included. Compared with the HOMA-IR-negative group, the HOMA-IR-positive group had higher PB (70.91 ± 11.49% vs 66.03 ± 13.04%, p = 0.040) and a higher RI (1.02 ± 0.32 vs 0.88 ± 0.28, p = 0.018). The HOMA-IR-positive group also showed a higher proportion of PR (43.4% vs 15.5%, p = 0.002). In the revised cluster-adjusted multivariable model (adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, BMI, eGFR, and oral anti-diabetic drug use), HOMA-IR positivity remained independently associated with PR (adjusted OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.08–11.92, p = 0.037). ROC analysis showed modest discrimination for HOMA-IR in identifying PR (AUC 0.656, 95% CI 0.542–0.771, p = 0.0074). The exploratory Youden-optimal cutoff was 2.44 (specificity 63.3%, sensitivity 71.9%). HOMA-IR-defined IR positivity was independently associated with PR and higher PB in this ACS IVUS cohort. However, HOMA-IR alone showed only modest discrimination for PR and should not be interpreted as a standalone clinical predictor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05710-2
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of insulin resistance and positive coronary artery remodeling and plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Kaiyuan Zou, Yongliang Cui, J Li, Sihao Xu et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Association of insulin resistance and positive coronary artery remodeling and plaque burden in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Kaiyuan Zou, Yongliang Cui, J Li, Sihao Xu, Lifu Miao, He Sun
article en

Abstract

Positive coronary remodeling (PR) and increased plaque burden (PB) are imaging markers of vulnerable coronary plaque. This study evaluated the association of insulin resistance (IR), assessed by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), with PR and PB in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We retrospectively included ACS patients who underwent IVUS-guided revascularization at a single center (December 2020 to December 2021). IR positivity was defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 2.5. IVUS was used to measure external elastic membrane (EEM) and lumen areas at the target lesion and reference segments. The remodeling index (RI) was calculated as target-lesion EEM area divided by the mean EEM area of proximal and distal reference segments. PR was defined as RI > 1.05, negative remodeling as RI < 0.95, and intermediate remodeling as 0.95–1.05. PB was calculated automatically by the IVUS system as (vessel area − lumen area)/vessel area. PB and remodeling analyses were lesion-level (111 lesions from 98 patients). Logistic regression for PR used patient-clustered robust standard errors. A total of 98 ACS patients (111 target lesions) were included. Compared with the HOMA-IR-negative group, the HOMA-IR-positive group had higher PB (70.91 ± 11.49% vs 66.03 ± 13.04%, p = 0.040) and a higher RI (1.02 ± 0.32 vs 0.88 ± 0.28, p = 0.018). The HOMA-IR-positive group also showed a higher proportion of PR (43.4% vs 15.5%, p = 0.002). In the revised cluster-adjusted multivariable model (adjusted for age, sex, HbA1c, BMI, eGFR, and oral anti-diabetic drug use), HOMA-IR positivity remained independently associated with PR (adjusted OR 3.59, 95% CI 1.08–11.92, p = 0.037). ROC analysis showed modest discrimination for HOMA-IR in identifying PR (AUC 0.656, 95% CI 0.542–0.771, p = 0.0074). The exploratory Youden-optimal cutoff was 2.44 (specificity 63.3%, sensitivity 71.9%). HOMA-IR-defined IR positivity was independently associated with PR and higher PB in this ACS IVUS cohort. However, HOMA-IR alone showed only modest discrimination for PR and should not be interpreted as a standalone clinical predictor.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Beijing Hua Xin Hospital (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.