Green Local Fiscal Autonomy in EU Member States

This article provides insights into how differences in the degree of fiscal autonomy of local governments in EU Member States shape the ways in which they design and implement fiscal instruments to support the achievement of climate objectives. By comparing three countries (Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands), it demonstrates that local governments’ capacity to leverage taxation for climate purposes is essentially shaped by their national legal and fiscal frameworks. At the same time, limited fiscal autonomy does not necessarily prevent local authorities from using fiscal instruments to support the achievement of climate objectives. This is illustrated, for instance, by the introduction of the ‘pay-as-you-throw’ (PAYT) waste fee in Turin, where such a measure can be implemented despite the relatively limited fiscal autonomy within the centralized Italian system. The article further shows that local climate plans across the EU acknowledge taxation as a policy tool for advancing sustainability goals, highlighting its potential to influence areas such as mobility, buildings and energy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Intertax
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2026036
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Green Local Fiscal Autonomy in EU Member States

Robert Kastelein
Intertax
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Green Local Fiscal Autonomy in EU Member States

Robert Kastelein
article en

Abstract

This article provides insights into how differences in the degree of fiscal autonomy of local governments in EU Member States shape the ways in which they design and implement fiscal instruments to support the achievement of climate objectives. By comparing three countries (Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands), it demonstrates that local governments’ capacity to leverage taxation for climate purposes is essentially shaped by their national legal and fiscal frameworks. At the same time, limited fiscal autonomy does not necessarily prevent local authorities from using fiscal instruments to support the achievement of climate objectives. This is illustrated, for instance, by the introduction of the ‘pay-as-you-throw’ (PAYT) waste fee in Turin, where such a measure can be implemented despite the relatively limited fiscal autonomy within the centralized Italian system. The article further shows that local climate plans across the EU acknowledge taxation as a policy tool for advancing sustainability goals, highlighting its potential to influence areas such as mobility, buildings and energy.

IntertaxVol. 54(Issue 4)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.