Comparative Effectiveness of Different Influenza Vaccine Formulations among Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended to prevent influenza in patients with kidney failure. It remains unclear whether newer, enhanced vaccine formulations are more effective than standard-dose, egg-based, inactivated influenza vaccine (standard-dose vaccine) in patients undergoing dialysis. We sought to compare the effectiveness of five influenza vaccine formulations among patients undergoing dialysis. METHODS: Using the United States Renal Data System database, we performed an active comparator cohort study among adults ≥65 years with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis (2011/12 to 2019/20 influenza seasons) who received a standard-dose, high-dose, cell culture-based, adjuvanted, or recombinant influenza vaccine within a given season. We compared the risk of influenza-like illness, influenza, influenza-related hospitalization, severe influenza, and all-cause mortality during the influenza season by vaccine formulation. Season-specific risk differences and relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) were estimated using propensity score-weighted Kaplan-Meier functions, accounting for the competing risk of death (for non-mortality outcomes). We combined the season-specific estimates via a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: 578,232 influenza patient-seasons included standard-dose vaccine (n=372,907), high-dose vaccine (n=192,880), cell culture-based vaccine (n=8,177), adjuvanted vaccine (n=3,308), or recombinant vaccine (n=960). Season-specific and meta-analytic estimates were consistent with a modest protective effect of high-dose vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine for influenza (meta-analytic rVE 5.1%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 10.5%), influenza-related hospitalization (meta-analytic rVE 5.5%; CI, -1.8% to 12.3%), and severe influenza (meta-analytic rVE 13.7%; CI, -9.7% to 32.1%), but not influenza-like illness or mortality. Patterns were similar for cell culture-based vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine (e.g., meta-analytic rVE for influenza, 18.3%; CI, 2.2% to 31.7%). Estimates for adjuvanted or recombinant versus standard-dose vaccines were imprecise. Quantitative bias analyses did not indicate residual confounding, although some estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults undergoing dialysis, high-dose vaccine and cell culture-based vaccine may provide modestly increased protection versus standard-dose vaccine.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001099
Primary Topic
Influenza Virus Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Influenza Vaccine Formulations among Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Vikas R. Dharnidharka, Katelin B. Nickel, John W. Davis, Anne M. Butler et al.
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Influenza Virus Research Studies
article

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Influenza Vaccine Formulations among Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

Vikas R. Dharnidharka, Katelin B. Nickel, John W. Davis, Anne M. Butler, J. Bradley Layton, John M. Sahrmann, David Jay Weber
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended to prevent influenza in patients with kidney failure. It remains unclear whether newer, enhanced vaccine formulations are more effective than standard-dose, egg-based, inactivated influenza vaccine (standard-dose vaccine) in patients undergoing dialysis. We sought to compare the effectiveness of five influenza vaccine formulations among patients undergoing dialysis. METHODS: Using the United States Renal Data System database, we performed an active comparator cohort study among adults ≥65 years with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis (2011/12 to 2019/20 influenza seasons) who received a standard-dose, high-dose, cell culture-based, adjuvanted, or recombinant influenza vaccine within a given season. We compared the risk of influenza-like illness, influenza, influenza-related hospitalization, severe influenza, and all-cause mortality during the influenza season by vaccine formulation. Season-specific risk differences and relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) were estimated using propensity score-weighted Kaplan-Meier functions, accounting for the competing risk of death (for non-mortality outcomes). We combined the season-specific estimates via a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: 578,232 influenza patient-seasons included standard-dose vaccine (n=372,907), high-dose vaccine (n=192,880), cell culture-based vaccine (n=8,177), adjuvanted vaccine (n=3,308), or recombinant vaccine (n=960). Season-specific and meta-analytic estimates were consistent with a modest protective effect of high-dose vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine for influenza (meta-analytic rVE 5.1%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 10.5%), influenza-related hospitalization (meta-analytic rVE 5.5%; CI, -1.8% to 12.3%), and severe influenza (meta-analytic rVE 13.7%; CI, -9.7% to 32.1%), but not influenza-like illness or mortality. Patterns were similar for cell culture-based vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine (e.g., meta-analytic rVE for influenza, 18.3%; CI, 2.2% to 31.7%). Estimates for adjuvanted or recombinant versus standard-dose vaccines were imprecise. Quantitative bias analyses did not indicate residual confounding, although some estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults undergoing dialysis, high-dose vaccine and cell culture-based vaccine may provide modestly increased protection versus standard-dose vaccine.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Johnson University (US), Jewish Hospital (US), RTI Health Solutions (US)
Pfizer, Novartis, Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, Moderna, National Institutes of Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Influenza Virus Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.