Comparative Effectiveness of Different Influenza Vaccine Formulations among Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis
BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccination is recommended to prevent influenza in patients with kidney failure. It remains unclear whether newer, enhanced vaccine formulations are more effective than standard-dose, egg-based, inactivated influenza vaccine (standard-dose vaccine) in patients undergoing dialysis. We sought to compare the effectiveness of five influenza vaccine formulations among patients undergoing dialysis. METHODS: Using the United States Renal Data System database, we performed an active comparator cohort study among adults ≥65 years with kidney failure undergoing hemodialysis (2011/12 to 2019/20 influenza seasons) who received a standard-dose, high-dose, cell culture-based, adjuvanted, or recombinant influenza vaccine within a given season. We compared the risk of influenza-like illness, influenza, influenza-related hospitalization, severe influenza, and all-cause mortality during the influenza season by vaccine formulation. Season-specific risk differences and relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) were estimated using propensity score-weighted Kaplan-Meier functions, accounting for the competing risk of death (for non-mortality outcomes). We combined the season-specific estimates via a random effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: 578,232 influenza patient-seasons included standard-dose vaccine (n=372,907), high-dose vaccine (n=192,880), cell culture-based vaccine (n=8,177), adjuvanted vaccine (n=3,308), or recombinant vaccine (n=960). Season-specific and meta-analytic estimates were consistent with a modest protective effect of high-dose vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine for influenza (meta-analytic rVE 5.1%; 95% CI, -0.7% to 10.5%), influenza-related hospitalization (meta-analytic rVE 5.5%; CI, -1.8% to 12.3%), and severe influenza (meta-analytic rVE 13.7%; CI, -9.7% to 32.1%), but not influenza-like illness or mortality. Patterns were similar for cell culture-based vaccine versus standard-dose vaccine (e.g., meta-analytic rVE for influenza, 18.3%; CI, 2.2% to 31.7%). Estimates for adjuvanted or recombinant versus standard-dose vaccines were imprecise. Quantitative bias analyses did not indicate residual confounding, although some estimates were imprecise. CONCLUSIONS: Among older adults undergoing dialysis, high-dose vaccine and cell culture-based vaccine may provide modestly increased protection versus standard-dose vaccine.
Authors
- Vikas R. Dharnidharka (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8000-1385)
- Katelin B. Nickel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4116-512X)
- John W. Davis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8137-0323)
- Anne M. Butler (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7307-6864)
- J. Bradley Layton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-5820)
- John M. Sahrmann (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-0908)
- David Jay Weber (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1726-4435)
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Barnes-Jewish Hospital (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Johnson University (US)
- Jewish Hospital (US)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Published
- 2026-04-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1681/asn.0000001099
- Primary Topic
- Influenza Virus Research Studies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Pfizer
- Novartis
- Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences
- Moderna
- National Institutes of Health
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research
- National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development