Kinship Trouble: What, When, Where, Why, and How—and So What?

Abstract What is kinship trouble? When and where did it emerge? Why does it matter and how can we overcome it? These questions guide our discussion of kinship trouble, a term meant to capture the difficulties in reconstructing ancient kin relations, but also an attempt to resolve them through interdisciplinary collaboration and ethically adequate approaches. Motivated by the importance of crossing disciplinary boundaries and the urgency of working together to understand human diversity in the past and present, we reconsider kinship not only as a biological or genetic but also as a social phenomenon for the study of societies through archaeogenetic, archaeological, and socio-cultural anthropological approaches. As to the question of how kinship trouble could be overcome, we propose making more ‘oddkin’ ( sensu Haraway) to bring disciplines into the conversation and foster unexpected collaborations around three themes: ethical collaboration, the integration of biological and social approaches, and kinship studies as acts of care and (non)mutuality of being.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774326100389
Primary Topic
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kinship Trouble: What, When, Where, Why, and How—and So What?

Maanasa Raghavan, Penny Bickle, Sabina Cveček
Cambridge Archaeological Journal
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
article

Kinship Trouble: What, When, Where, Why, and How—and So What?

Maanasa Raghavan, Penny Bickle, Sabina Cveček
article en

Abstract

Abstract What is kinship trouble? When and where did it emerge? Why does it matter and how can we overcome it? These questions guide our discussion of kinship trouble, a term meant to capture the difficulties in reconstructing ancient kin relations, but also an attempt to resolve them through interdisciplinary collaboration and ethically adequate approaches. Motivated by the importance of crossing disciplinary boundaries and the urgency of working together to understand human diversity in the past and present, we reconsider kinship not only as a biological or genetic but also as a social phenomenon for the study of societies through archaeogenetic, archaeological, and socio-cultural anthropological approaches. As to the question of how kinship trouble could be overcome, we propose making more ‘oddkin’ ( sensu Haraway) to bring disciplines into the conversation and foster unexpected collaborations around three themes: ethical collaboration, the integration of biological and social approaches, and kinship studies as acts of care and (non)mutuality of being.

Cambridge Archaeological JournalVol. 36(2)
Field Museum of Natural History (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), University of Chicago (US), Arheološki Institut (RS), University of York (GB)
University of Minnesota, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Oxford, European Commission, Universitetet i Bergen, National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Kinship Trouble: What, When, Where, Why, and How—and So What? — Maanasa Raghavan, Penny Bickle, et al. · Cambridge Archaeological Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS