Nonlinear dynamics and stability of a strongly nonlinear damped cubic-quintic oscillator

Abstract This paper presents a stability analysis of a strongly nonlinear damped cubic-quintic oscillator using three approaches: the classical multiple scales (CMS) method, an enriched multiple scales (EMS) method based on homotopy perturbation, and numerical continuation via MatCont. Comparisons across different nonlinearity regimes reveal that CMS accuracy degrades substantially when the perturbation parameter $$\varepsilon$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> </mml:math> is not small. In the cubic-dominant case ( $$\alpha _3 = 10$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$\alpha _5 = 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$\varepsilon = 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), CMS overestimates peak amplitudes by approximately 60% and mislocates bifurcation points, whereas EMS predictions remain within 1–2% of numerical results. Even under strong cubic nonlinearity ( $$\alpha _3 = 100$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), EMS maintains agreement within 3% while CMS errors reach 25%. The EMS method also accurately captures both stable and unstable solution branches, with stability boundaries matching Floquet-based numerical detection to within 0.1%. These results suggest that EMS may serve as a useful analytical tool for strongly nonlinear oscillators where traditional perturbation methods lose accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44444-026-00105-2
Primary Topic
Chaos control and synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nonlinear dynamics and stability of a strongly nonlinear damped cubic-quintic oscillator

Hussain M Al-Qahtani
Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences
Chaos control and synchronization
article

Nonlinear dynamics and stability of a strongly nonlinear damped cubic-quintic oscillator

Hussain M Al-Qahtani
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a stability analysis of a strongly nonlinear damped cubic-quintic oscillator using three approaches: the classical multiple scales (CMS) method, an enriched multiple scales (EMS) method based on homotopy perturbation, and numerical continuation via MatCont. Comparisons across different nonlinearity regimes reveal that CMS accuracy degrades substantially when the perturbation parameter $$\varepsilon$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> </mml:math> is not small. In the cubic-dominant case ( $$\alpha _3 = 10$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$\alpha _5 = 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> , $$\varepsilon = 1$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>ε</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), CMS overestimates peak amplitudes by approximately 60% and mislocates bifurcation points, whereas EMS predictions remain within 1–2% of numerical results. Even under strong cubic nonlinearity ( $$\alpha _3 = 100$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mi>α</mml:mi> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:msub> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>100</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ), EMS maintains agreement within 3% while CMS errors reach 25%. The EMS method also accurately captures both stable and unstable solution branches, with stability boundaries matching Floquet-based numerical detection to within 0.1%. These results suggest that EMS may serve as a useful analytical tool for strongly nonlinear oscillators where traditional perturbation methods lose accuracy.

Journal of King Saud University - Engineering SciencesVol. 38(4)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA)
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Chaos control and synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.