Comparing the Sustainable Role of Higher Education in National Artificial Intelligence Strategies Through the Lens of Policy Documents in China, Japan, and South Korea (2017–2025)

The sustainable role of higher education and its governance logic is increasingly prominent in national artificial intelligence (AI) strategies. Based on core AI-related policy documents issued by China, Japan, and South Korea between 2017 and 2025, the corpus-based analysis conducts a systematic comparison, by means of text coding, from strategic positioning, policy architecture, educational philosophy, and a governance model. All three countries have established AI as a critically sustainable component of national development strategy and explicitly defined its functional role in higher education at the strategic level. However, varied distinct differences are found in the policy implementation approaches and governance structures. China adopts a centralized, state-led approach characterized by a high degree of integration among institutional instruments. Japan reinforces liberal education reform in the context of higher education and extends educational responsibilities across society through a lifelong learning framework. Driven by global technological competition, South Korea advances digital transformation of the education system, while building a trustworthy AI governance system. These divergent policy models reveal the sustainable interplay between national AI strategies and higher education. Overall, our findings indicate that the evolution trajectories of AI strategies affect the stability and adaptive capacity of higher education systems in the long term.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083831
Primary Topic
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing the Sustainable Role of Higher Education in National Artificial Intelligence Strategies Through the Lens of Policy Documents in China, Japan, and South Korea (2017–2025)

Zhunan Yang
Sustainability
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
article

Comparing the Sustainable Role of Higher Education in National Artificial Intelligence Strategies Through the Lens of Policy Documents in China, Japan, and South Korea (2017–2025)

Zhunan Yang
article en

Abstract

The sustainable role of higher education and its governance logic is increasingly prominent in national artificial intelligence (AI) strategies. Based on core AI-related policy documents issued by China, Japan, and South Korea between 2017 and 2025, the corpus-based analysis conducts a systematic comparison, by means of text coding, from strategic positioning, policy architecture, educational philosophy, and a governance model. All three countries have established AI as a critically sustainable component of national development strategy and explicitly defined its functional role in higher education at the strategic level. However, varied distinct differences are found in the policy implementation approaches and governance structures. China adopts a centralized, state-led approach characterized by a high degree of integration among institutional instruments. Japan reinforces liberal education reform in the context of higher education and extends educational responsibilities across society through a lifelong learning framework. Driven by global technological competition, South Korea advances digital transformation of the education system, while building a trustworthy AI governance system. These divergent policy models reveal the sustainable interplay between national AI strategies and higher education. Overall, our findings indicate that the evolution trajectories of AI strategies affect the stability and adaptive capacity of higher education systems in the long term.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
Dalian Maritime University (CN)
Dalian Maritime University, National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Global Educational Policies and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.