Hamburger Patty Formulations Using Mh-Genotype Beef: Nutritional Quality and Sensory Properties

The lipid composition of meat intended for hamburger patties can be modified through genetic selection in cattle. Cattle carrying the F94L allele have been reported to produce leaner meat with a higher proportion of unsaturated fatty acids than those without this allele. However, evidence concerning the nutritional quality and sensory acceptability of hamburgers produced with meat from these cattle remains limited. In this study, the nutritional quality and sensory properties of hamburger patties formulated with meat and subcutaneous fat from cattle carrying the F94L allele were compared with those of noncarrier animals. Patties were formulated with two fat levels (high fat, HF; low fat, LF) and analyzed under raw and cooked conditions. Compared with the Control formulations, the F94L/− formulations possessed a higher polyunsaturated fatty acid content, with absolute differences of +1.16 in the raw state and +2.04 after cooking compared with the Control formulations. In addition, the PUFA/SFA ratio was higher in the cooked samples (+0.04; p < 0.05). In the sensory analysis, the formulations were not rejected; however, Control HF obtained the highest acceptance score (6.49). These results suggest that the use of meat from F94L/− cattle allows the formulation of hamburger patties with a more favorable fatty acid profile, but with no improvement in sensory acceptance compared with the noncarrier control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083770
Primary Topic
Meat and Animal Product Quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hamburger Patty Formulations Using Mh-Genotype Beef: Nutritional Quality and Sensory Properties

Williams Arellano‐Vera, Francisco Joel Jahuey‐Martínez, Diana A. Vela‐Vásquez, Estela Garza Brenner et al.
Applied Sciences
Meat and Animal Product Quality
article

Hamburger Patty Formulations Using Mh-Genotype Beef: Nutritional Quality and Sensory Properties

Williams Arellano‐Vera, Francisco Joel Jahuey‐Martínez, Diana A. Vela‐Vásquez, Estela Garza Brenner, Ana María Sifuentes‐Rincón, Christian Cervantes Munguía
article en

Abstract

The lipid composition of meat intended for hamburger patties can be modified through genetic selection in cattle. Cattle carrying the F94L allele have been reported to produce leaner meat with a higher proportion of unsaturated fatty acids than those without this allele. However, evidence concerning the nutritional quality and sensory acceptability of hamburgers produced with meat from these cattle remains limited. In this study, the nutritional quality and sensory properties of hamburger patties formulated with meat and subcutaneous fat from cattle carrying the F94L allele were compared with those of noncarrier animals. Patties were formulated with two fat levels (high fat, HF; low fat, LF) and analyzed under raw and cooked conditions. Compared with the Control formulations, the F94L/− formulations possessed a higher polyunsaturated fatty acid content, with absolute differences of +1.16 in the raw state and +2.04 after cooking compared with the Control formulations. In addition, the PUFA/SFA ratio was higher in the cooked samples (+0.04; p < 0.05). In the sensory analysis, the formulations were not rejected; however, Control HF obtained the highest acceptance score (6.49). These results suggest that the use of meat from F94L/− cattle allows the formulation of hamburger patties with a more favorable fatty acid profile, but with no improvement in sensory acceptance compared with the noncarrier control.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(8)
Autonomous University of Chihuahua (MX), Instituto Politécnico Nacional (MX), Universidad Autónoma Agraria Antonio Narro (MX)
Instituto Politécnico Nacional
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Meat and Animal Product Quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.