Device-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Placed at Referral Centers Versus Cardiogenic Shock Hub Centers: An Observational Analysis

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical support (tMCS) devices are often placed for cardiogenic shock (CS) at regional referral centers (RRCs) before transfer to CS hub centers (HCs). We sought to assess for differences in device-related adverse events (DRAEs) and outcomes between patients with tMCS placement for CS at an RRC before transfer to an HC compared with initial tMCS device placement at an HC. METHODS: All patients with tMCS for CS from August 2021 to August 2024 at a single center were stratified by location of initial tMCS device placement. Baseline characteristics, adjudicated DRAEs, mortality, and unfavorable outcomes (death before discharge, heart transplant, or durable left ventricular assist device) were compared. DRAE rates were calculated as events/patient-week on tMCS. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to account for baseline differences. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed to compare mortality. RESULTS: =0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Initial tMCS placement for CS at an RRC with transfer to an HC is associated with a higher DRAE prevalence and worse outcomes than initial tMCS placement at a CS HC. The higher mortality in RRC-implanted patients may be due to greater CS severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Heart Failure
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.125.013742
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Device-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Placed at Referral Centers Versus Cardiogenic Shock Hub Centers: An Observational Analysis

MICHELE L. ESPOSITO, Molly Silkowski, Anthony Carnicelli, Brady Gunn et al.
Circulation Heart Failure
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Device-Related Adverse Events and Outcomes in Patients With Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support Placed at Referral Centers Versus Cardiogenic Shock Hub Centers: An Observational Analysis

MICHELE L. ESPOSITO, Molly Silkowski, Anthony Carnicelli, Brady Gunn, Kelly Ohlrich, Ryan J. Tedford, B. Houston, Zachary Patel, Mathew J. Gregoski, Lindsey Bull, Stephanie Samani, Meg Ospina, Kaylen Dodson, Roxanne Mittelstaedt, Jacob Peller, Charlotte Marchell, Michael Varrone, Hajj Jennifer, Arman Kilic, Lucas Witer, Jeffrey D. McMurray
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Temporary mechanical support (tMCS) devices are often placed for cardiogenic shock (CS) at regional referral centers (RRCs) before transfer to CS hub centers (HCs). We sought to assess for differences in device-related adverse events (DRAEs) and outcomes between patients with tMCS placement for CS at an RRC before transfer to an HC compared with initial tMCS device placement at an HC. METHODS: All patients with tMCS for CS from August 2021 to August 2024 at a single center were stratified by location of initial tMCS device placement. Baseline characteristics, adjudicated DRAEs, mortality, and unfavorable outcomes (death before discharge, heart transplant, or durable left ventricular assist device) were compared. DRAE rates were calculated as events/patient-week on tMCS. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to account for baseline differences. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed to compare mortality. RESULTS: =0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Initial tMCS placement for CS at an RRC with transfer to an HC is associated with a higher DRAE prevalence and worse outcomes than initial tMCS placement at a CS HC. The higher mortality in RRC-implanted patients may be due to greater CS severity.

Circulation Heart Failure
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.