Assessment of additional information related to genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)

In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA-GMO-BE-2016-138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food and feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information on the composition of oilseed rape MS11. The GMO Panel concluded that the information can be used to complement the original assessment. None of the differences identified in seed composition between oilseed rape MS11 and the conventional counterpart needed further assessment regarding food and feed safety. The GMO Panel found no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of oilseed rape MS11. Τhe consumption of oilseed rape MS11 does not represent any nutritional concern. Νo post-market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. Considering the assessment reported in the original scientific opinion and in this statement, the GMO Panel concludes that oilseed rape MS11 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM oilseed rape reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
EFSA Journal
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2026.10016
Primary Topic
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of additional information related to genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)

Giacomo De Sanctis, Francisco Barro, Alan H. Schulman, Frits Koning et al.
EFSA Journal
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
article

Assessment of additional information related to genetically modified oilseed rape MS11 (application EFSA‐GMO‐BE‐2016‐138)

Giacomo De Sanctis, Francisco Barro, Alan H. Schulman, Frits Koning, Antonio Fernández Dumont, Michelle M. Epstein, Eve Veromann, Jean‐Luc Gallois, Antoine Messéan, Ruud de Maagd, Fabien Nogué, EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Christoph Tebbe, Arianna Ferrari, Tilemachos Goumperis, Giovanni Savoini, Albert Braeuning, F. Javier Moreno, Josep Casacuberta, Andrea Gennaro, Thomas Frenzel, Michele Ardizzone, Franco Maria Neri
article en

Abstract

In a previous scientific opinion on application EFSA-GMO-BE-2016-138, the EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO Panel) could not conclude on the comparative analysis and on the food and feed safety assessment of genetically modified (GM) oilseed rape MS11 because of the lack of an appropriate compositional data set. Following a request from the European Commission, the GMO Panel assessed additional information on the composition of oilseed rape MS11. The GMO Panel concluded that the information can be used to complement the original assessment. None of the differences identified in seed composition between oilseed rape MS11 and the conventional counterpart needed further assessment regarding food and feed safety. The GMO Panel found no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of oilseed rape MS11. Τhe consumption of oilseed rape MS11 does not represent any nutritional concern. Νo post-market monitoring of food and feed is considered necessary. Considering the assessment reported in the original scientific opinion and in this statement, the GMO Panel concludes that oilseed rape MS11 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM oilseed rape reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

EFSA JournalVol. 24(4)
European Food Safety Authority
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Genetically Modified Organisms Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.