The Patient, the Provider, and the TikTok Creator: Qualitative Analysis of the Content and Quality of Videos on Prenatal Genetic Screening

INTRODUCTION: Although providers may view the use of the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) screen as an opportunity for patients to learn more about potential chromosomal variants of a fetus, research suggests that patients may view the genetic screening test primarily as an opportunity to learn about their fetus's sex chromosomes and may not understand the implications of a screening test, as compared with a diagnostic test. This study critically evaluates the informational quality of TikTok content related to NIPT, with a specific focus on the use and conflation of sex and gender terminology. METHODS: A total of 83 TikTok videos met our inclusion criteria. Two team members systematically coded the videos using a modified DISCERN instrument and content-specific codes to assess reliability and informational quality across 3 content creator categories: patients/nonexperts, health care professionals, and organizations. Many codes focused specifically on the use of gendered language in the videos. RESULTS: Patient-generated content exhibited the highest engagement metrics but frequently misrepresented NIPT as a confirmatory test and conflated sex with gender. Health care provider and organizational videos demonstrated higher informational reliability but were not immune to deterministic language around sex and gender and promotional framing. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the influence of social media as a health information source and reveal significant gaps in public understanding of NIPT, particularly regarding its screening nature and limitations. Additionally, these results highlight the need for clinical protocols that address patient misconceptions and suggest that health care professionals should actively engage with digital platforms to familiarize themselves with what patients are seeing and hearing online. Recommendations include avoiding gendered mirroring, asking questions about patient knowledge, and leveraging social media for public health education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.70121
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Patient, the Provider, and the TikTok Creator: Qualitative Analysis of the Content and Quality of Videos on Prenatal Genetic Screening

Robin E. Jensen, Caitlin Quade, Naomi O. Riches, Erin Johnson et al.
Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

The Patient, the Provider, and the TikTok Creator: Qualitative Analysis of the Content and Quality of Videos on Prenatal Genetic Screening

Robin E. Jensen, Caitlin Quade, Naomi O. Riches, Erin Johnson, Susanna R. Cohen, Emma Murdock, Stephanie Arceneaux
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although providers may view the use of the noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) screen as an opportunity for patients to learn more about potential chromosomal variants of a fetus, research suggests that patients may view the genetic screening test primarily as an opportunity to learn about their fetus's sex chromosomes and may not understand the implications of a screening test, as compared with a diagnostic test. This study critically evaluates the informational quality of TikTok content related to NIPT, with a specific focus on the use and conflation of sex and gender terminology. METHODS: A total of 83 TikTok videos met our inclusion criteria. Two team members systematically coded the videos using a modified DISCERN instrument and content-specific codes to assess reliability and informational quality across 3 content creator categories: patients/nonexperts, health care professionals, and organizations. Many codes focused specifically on the use of gendered language in the videos. RESULTS: Patient-generated content exhibited the highest engagement metrics but frequently misrepresented NIPT as a confirmatory test and conflated sex with gender. Health care provider and organizational videos demonstrated higher informational reliability but were not immune to deterministic language around sex and gender and promotional framing. DISCUSSION: The findings underscore the influence of social media as a health information source and reveal significant gaps in public understanding of NIPT, particularly regarding its screening nature and limitations. Additionally, these results highlight the need for clinical protocols that address patient misconceptions and suggest that health care professionals should actively engage with digital platforms to familiarize themselves with what patients are seeing and hearing online. Recommendations include avoiding gendered mirroring, asking questions about patient knowledge, and leveraging social media for public health education.

Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health
University of Utah (US), University of Utah Hospital (US)
National Institutes of Health
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.