A scoping review of participatory tools and practices in collaborative processes: Towards multi-actor collaboration in integrated landscape approaches

In this article, we ask how the different tools and practices used in participatory and collaborative processes could support multi-actor collaboration in integrated landscape approaches (ILAs). First, we conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesize literature on participatory and collaborative approaches related to forest, water, land and landscapes. Secondly, we analysed 130 articles to understand how and by which means these approaches engaged different actors in multi-actor collaborations. Our findings identified a wealth of different tools and practices available to support participatory and collaborative approaches, such as participatory mapping and modelling, games and visualizations, scenario development, and knowledge co-creation. Further, our scoping review identifies 30 articles about processes with core elements of collaborative governance, namely, principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity of joint action. We argue that externally directed processes with short-term funding do not ensure multi-actor collaboration and a commitment towards ILAs. Both collaborative governance and ILAs demand administrative openness, cross-sectoral collaboration and recognize feedback loops to ensure evolving collaboration.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Landscape and Urban Planning
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2026.105664
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A scoping review of participatory tools and practices in collaborative processes: Towards multi-actor collaboration in integrated landscape approaches

Rijal Ramdani, Nicole Lisa Klenk, Suzana Samson Nyanda, Edda Tandi Lwoga et al.
Landscape and Urban Planning
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

A scoping review of participatory tools and practices in collaborative processes: Towards multi-actor collaboration in integrated landscape approaches

Rijal Ramdani, Nicole Lisa Klenk, Suzana Samson Nyanda, Edda Tandi Lwoga, Anna Mustonen, Ida Herdieckerhoff, Rebecca J. McLain, Raúl Salas Reyes, Irmeli Mustalahti, Denis Dobrynin, Ubaldus Tumaini, Agustiyara Agustiyara, Aristarik H. Maro, Miriam Castillo Orozco, Gadfly Stratton
article en

Abstract

In this article, we ask how the different tools and practices used in participatory and collaborative processes could support multi-actor collaboration in integrated landscape approaches (ILAs). First, we conducted a scoping review to identify and synthesize literature on participatory and collaborative approaches related to forest, water, land and landscapes. Secondly, we analysed 130 articles to understand how and by which means these approaches engaged different actors in multi-actor collaborations. Our findings identified a wealth of different tools and practices available to support participatory and collaborative approaches, such as participatory mapping and modelling, games and visualizations, scenario development, and knowledge co-creation. Further, our scoping review identifies 30 articles about processes with core elements of collaborative governance, namely, principled engagement, shared motivation, and capacity of joint action. We argue that externally directed processes with short-term funding do not ensure multi-actor collaboration and a commitment towards ILAs. Both collaborative governance and ILAs demand administrative openness, cross-sectoral collaboration and recognize feedback loops to ensure evolving collaboration.

Landscape and Urban PlanningVol. 272
Itä-Suomen Yliopisto, Academy of Finland
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.