Incidence of Using Physical, Mechanical Restraints and Seclusion in Saudi Mental Health Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of physical and mechanical restraints and seclusion in psychiatric facilities to manage violent and aggressive behaviours has long been a contentious issue, balancing patient safety with ethical considerations. With advancements in psychiatry and increased understanding of mental illness, there have been expectations that such interventions would no longer be required; however, their use persists in clinical practice. Management policies differ across countries and are largely influenced by legal frameworks. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the incidence of these interventions across two psychiatric facilities in Saudi Arabia and to examine associations among inpatient variables. METHODS: = 268). Data from 333 restriction events were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and negative binomial regression to calculate incidence rates and explore associated factors. RESULTS: The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors related to patient characteristics and clinical and environmental conditions within the facilities. Key contributing variables included symptom deterioration and the duration of observation required. Longer observation periods were associated with certain diagnoses, particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Restraints and seclusion remain influenced by multiple interacting factors within psychiatric settings. These findings highlight the need to reduce their use and ensure they are applied cautiously, with greater emphasis on minimising patient trauma and promoting safer, person-centred care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14081011
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of Using Physical, Mechanical Restraints and Seclusion in Saudi Mental Health Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study

Karina Lovell, Antonia Marsden, Asrar Salem Almutairi, Owen Price et al.
Healthcare
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

Incidence of Using Physical, Mechanical Restraints and Seclusion in Saudi Mental Health Settings: A Prospective Cohort Study

Karina Lovell, Antonia Marsden, Asrar Salem Almutairi, Owen Price, Saleh M. AlSaidan, Modhi Mfadhi Alanazi, Abdullah Hassan Alqahtani, Abdullelah Waleed Almulhim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The use of physical and mechanical restraints and seclusion in psychiatric facilities to manage violent and aggressive behaviours has long been a contentious issue, balancing patient safety with ethical considerations. With advancements in psychiatry and increased understanding of mental illness, there have been expectations that such interventions would no longer be required; however, their use persists in clinical practice. Management policies differ across countries and are largely influenced by legal frameworks. This study aimed to identify the factors influencing the incidence of these interventions across two psychiatric facilities in Saudi Arabia and to examine associations among inpatient variables. METHODS: = 268). Data from 333 restriction events were analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and negative binomial regression to calculate incidence rates and explore associated factors. RESULTS: The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors related to patient characteristics and clinical and environmental conditions within the facilities. Key contributing variables included symptom deterioration and the duration of observation required. Longer observation periods were associated with certain diagnoses, particularly schizophrenia and mood disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Restraints and seclusion remain influenced by multiple interacting factors within psychiatric settings. These findings highlight the need to reduce their use and ensure they are applied cautiously, with greater emphasis on minimising patient trauma and promoting safer, person-centred care.

HealthcareVol. 14(8)
Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (SA), Umm al-Qura University (SA), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SA), King Fahd Hospital of the University (SA), University of Manchester (GB), Dammam Central Hospital (SA)
University of Manchester, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.