Mechanisms of freshwater zoogeochemistry: A review and meta‐analysis of animal impacts on ecosystem function

Freshwater ecosystems are under immense pressure from global environmental change. These stressors have led to biogeochemical alterations, rapid rates of defaunation and losses of associated animal-driven ecosystem functions. Zoogeochemistry provides a unique perspective on the dual challenges of global change and defaunation in freshwater ecosystems, but zoogeochemical frameworks that explicitly link conservation biology with biogeochemistry have not yet been fully embraced by freshwater ecologists. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the mechanistic roles that animals play in freshwater biogeochemistry, with the aim of advancing the application of zoogeochemistry in freshwaters. We reviewed 14 major mechanisms of freshwater zoogeochemistry. Our review shows that a diversity of taxa impact ecosystem-level elemental pools and fluxes, within and across freshwater ecosystem boundaries. However, these effects are not always placed in context at the ecosystem level, which limits the scope of our meta-analysis. Zoogeochemical impacts tended to be stronger in wetlands and lakes than in streams and estuaries. Consumption, excretion, and respiration had the strongest direct impacts on elemental pools and fluxes; bioturbation, consumption, and egestion had the strongest indirect impacts. These mechanisms often interacted, generating complex influences on elemental pools and fluxes. However, creative experimental designs can be used to isolate individual mechanisms, allowing complex effects with multiple mechanisms to be incorporated into ecosystem models. Quantifying and modelling zoogeochemical effects in freshwater ecosystems will allow ecologists and managers to make informed decisions that balance biodiversity conservation with healthy ecosystem function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Animal Ecology
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.70252
Primary Topic
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mechanisms of freshwater zoogeochemistry: A review and meta‐analysis of animal impacts on ecosystem function

Chelsea R. Smith, Garrett W. Hopper, Augustine Sitati, Frank Chukwuzuoke Akamagwuna et al.
Journal of Animal Ecology
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
article

Mechanisms of freshwater zoogeochemistry: A review and meta‐analysis of animal impacts on ecosystem function

Chelsea R. Smith, Garrett W. Hopper, Augustine Sitati, Frank Chukwuzuoke Akamagwuna, Carla L. Atkinson, Lindsey K. Albertson, Jonathan W. Lopez, Hayley C. Oakland, Jennifer S. Haase, Samuel F. Fritz, Stephen Plont, Matthew B. Lodato, Benjamin B. Tumolo, Tori A. Hebert, Adam C. Siders, Taylor C. Michael, Madison P. Kuczek, Jacob D. Dorris, Adam C. Hensley, Julia N. Morin, D. Kyle Breault
article en

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems are under immense pressure from global environmental change. These stressors have led to biogeochemical alterations, rapid rates of defaunation and losses of associated animal-driven ecosystem functions. Zoogeochemistry provides a unique perspective on the dual challenges of global change and defaunation in freshwater ecosystems, but zoogeochemical frameworks that explicitly link conservation biology with biogeochemistry have not yet been fully embraced by freshwater ecologists. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the mechanistic roles that animals play in freshwater biogeochemistry, with the aim of advancing the application of zoogeochemistry in freshwaters. We reviewed 14 major mechanisms of freshwater zoogeochemistry. Our review shows that a diversity of taxa impact ecosystem-level elemental pools and fluxes, within and across freshwater ecosystem boundaries. However, these effects are not always placed in context at the ecosystem level, which limits the scope of our meta-analysis. Zoogeochemical impacts tended to be stronger in wetlands and lakes than in streams and estuaries. Consumption, excretion, and respiration had the strongest direct impacts on elemental pools and fluxes; bioturbation, consumption, and egestion had the strongest indirect impacts. These mechanisms often interacted, generating complex influences on elemental pools and fluxes. However, creative experimental designs can be used to isolate individual mechanisms, allowing complex effects with multiple mechanisms to be incorporated into ecosystem models. Quantifying and modelling zoogeochemical effects in freshwater ecosystems will allow ecologists and managers to make informed decisions that balance biodiversity conservation with healthy ecosystem function.

Journal of Animal Ecology
Louisiana State University (US), Texas Tech University (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Alabama (US), Northern Michigan University (US), Montana State University (US), University of Mississippi (US)
Division of Biological Infrastructure, Division of Environmental Biology
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Isotope Analysis in Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.