Comparative analysis of bias and quality in YouTube videos on bariatric surgery and weight-loss medications

Abstract Background Weight-loss surgery (WLS) remains the most effective treatment for clinically severe obesity, while weight-loss medications (WLM), particularly GLP-1 agonists, have recently gained widespread public attention. With YouTube serving as a major source of health information, the quality and tone of videos discussing these interventions warrant evaluation. This study compares the source, content quality, and perceived tone of YouTube videos related to WLS and WLM. Methods Using an incognito browser, the first 200 “most relevant” YouTube videos for the search terms “weight loss surgery” and “weight loss medicine” were screened in October 2023. Eligible videos were categorized by source and content type. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, and tone was classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Two independent reviewers scored all videos, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for comparisons, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 129 WLS and 111 WLM videos were analyzed. WLM videos demonstrated significantly higher view ratios ( p < 0.0001) and more comments ( p = 0.0014). WLM videos were predominantly commercial (76%) and informational (97%). Mean DISCERN scores were higher for WLM videos (46.69 ± 8.75; fair) compared with WLS videos (40.32 ± 8.70; poor; p = 0.0366). In contrast, WLS videos more frequently originated from academic centers (50%) and included patient experience content (49%). Tone differed significantly between groups ( p < 0.01): 60% of WLS videos were positive, whereas WLM videos exhibited fewer positive (44%) and more negative tones (14%). Conclusions WLM videos were of higher informational quality but conveyed a less positive overall tone, whereas WLS videos presented more positively but were of lower quality. These findings highlight substantial variation in publicly accessible YouTube content on weight-loss interventions and underscore the need for improved, high-quality patient education materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-12795-5
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative analysis of bias and quality in YouTube videos on bariatric surgery and weight-loss medications

Mason Henrich, Aram E. Jawed, Aziz M. Merchant, Julia Botvinov et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

Comparative analysis of bias and quality in YouTube videos on bariatric surgery and weight-loss medications

Mason Henrich, Aram E. Jawed, Aziz M. Merchant, Julia Botvinov, Qichen Deng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Weight-loss surgery (WLS) remains the most effective treatment for clinically severe obesity, while weight-loss medications (WLM), particularly GLP-1 agonists, have recently gained widespread public attention. With YouTube serving as a major source of health information, the quality and tone of videos discussing these interventions warrant evaluation. This study compares the source, content quality, and perceived tone of YouTube videos related to WLS and WLM. Methods Using an incognito browser, the first 200 “most relevant” YouTube videos for the search terms “weight loss surgery” and “weight loss medicine” were screened in October 2023. Eligible videos were categorized by source and content type. Video quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument, and tone was classified as positive, neutral, or negative. Two independent reviewers scored all videos, with a third reviewer resolving disagreements. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests were used for comparisons, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05. Results A total of 129 WLS and 111 WLM videos were analyzed. WLM videos demonstrated significantly higher view ratios ( p < 0.0001) and more comments ( p = 0.0014). WLM videos were predominantly commercial (76%) and informational (97%). Mean DISCERN scores were higher for WLM videos (46.69 ± 8.75; fair) compared with WLS videos (40.32 ± 8.70; poor; p = 0.0366). In contrast, WLS videos more frequently originated from academic centers (50%) and included patient experience content (49%). Tone differed significantly between groups ( p < 0.01): 60% of WLS videos were positive, whereas WLM videos exhibited fewer positive (44%) and more negative tones (14%). Conclusions WLM videos were of higher informational quality but conveyed a less positive overall tone, whereas WLS videos presented more positively but were of lower quality. These findings highlight substantial variation in publicly accessible YouTube content on weight-loss interventions and underscore the need for improved, high-quality patient education materials.

Surgical EndoscopyVol. 40(5)
Center for Discovery (US), John F. Kennedy Medical Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.