Lifestyle medicine integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a rapid scoping review.

BACKGROUND: Globally, there has been a rise in chronic disease attributable to a change in lifestyle post-industrialisation. Lifestyle medicine has shown promise in preventing and managing these conditions, yet within the context of Australia it remains underutilised in general practice due to structural and systemic barriers. Lifestyle medicine focuses on behavioural interventions across modifiable lifestyle factors to prevent and treat noncommunicable disease. Additionally, it has been established that behavioural change is more likely when social and lifestyle needs are addressed as a whole system. This rapid scoping review evaluated implementation of lifestyle medicine in primary care and identified key enablers and barriers to inform its effective integration into the Australian primary healthcare system. METHODS: Following an adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews method for rapid scoping reviews, MEDLINE Ovid and CINAHL databases were searched for models of care utilising lifestyle medicine interventions in primary care. In total 28 studies were included for review. RESULTS: Key enablers included embedding lifestyle medicine into standard care pathways, employing health coaches and social prescribers, offering group or digital interventions, and incorporating lifestyle medicine into medical education. Identified barriers included time constraints, fee-for-service funding models that discourage holistic care, limited practitioner training in health coaching, and poor integration with community services. CONCLUSIONS: Although lifestyle medicine holds significant promise, its success depends on integrated care models, team-based delivery, policy support, and further research using implementation science frameworks. We suggest using lifestyle medicine as a quality improvement framework to guide future system reform, practice innovation, and evidence generation in primary care in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/py25215
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lifestyle medicine integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a rapid scoping review.

Karen Carlisle, Emma King, Sam Manger, David Taniar
PubMed
Obesity and Health Practices
article

Lifestyle medicine integrated care models in primary care and factors that contribute to their effective implementation: a rapid scoping review.

Karen Carlisle, Emma King, Sam Manger, David Taniar
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, there has been a rise in chronic disease attributable to a change in lifestyle post-industrialisation. Lifestyle medicine has shown promise in preventing and managing these conditions, yet within the context of Australia it remains underutilised in general practice due to structural and systemic barriers. Lifestyle medicine focuses on behavioural interventions across modifiable lifestyle factors to prevent and treat noncommunicable disease. Additionally, it has been established that behavioural change is more likely when social and lifestyle needs are addressed as a whole system. This rapid scoping review evaluated implementation of lifestyle medicine in primary care and identified key enablers and barriers to inform its effective integration into the Australian primary healthcare system. METHODS: Following an adapted Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews method for rapid scoping reviews, MEDLINE Ovid and CINAHL databases were searched for models of care utilising lifestyle medicine interventions in primary care. In total 28 studies were included for review. RESULTS: Key enablers included embedding lifestyle medicine into standard care pathways, employing health coaches and social prescribers, offering group or digital interventions, and incorporating lifestyle medicine into medical education. Identified barriers included time constraints, fee-for-service funding models that discourage holistic care, limited practitioner training in health coaching, and poor integration with community services. CONCLUSIONS: Although lifestyle medicine holds significant promise, its success depends on integrated care models, team-based delivery, policy support, and further research using implementation science frameworks. We suggest using lifestyle medicine as a quality improvement framework to guide future system reform, practice innovation, and evidence generation in primary care in Australia.

PubMedVol. 32(2)
Monash University (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.