Commentary on the (In)Visibility of LGBTQ+ Victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews

This paper is a commentary on the (in)visibility of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews (DVFRs). Drawing on a practitioner–researcher perspective and a case study of Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales, this paper’s originality stems from the author’s practitioner–researcher perspective. LGBTQ+ lives can be made (in)visible as a result of how in-scope deaths are identified, whether knowledge and expertise are included, and because of how the lives of LGBTQ+ victims are represented. This commentary explores how DVFRs can make LGBTQ+ lives (in)visible. Critically, however, it identifies how these considerations relate to broader questions, including the responses to LGBTQ+ domestic abuse generally and the functioning of DVFRs specifically, and also has implications for how researchers use the findings of review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Family Violence
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-026-01100-6
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Commentary on the (In)Visibility of LGBTQ+ Victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews

James Rowlands
Journal of Family Violence
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Commentary on the (In)Visibility of LGBTQ+ Victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews

James Rowlands
article en

Abstract

This paper is a commentary on the (in)visibility of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Queer (LGBTQ+) victims in Domestic Violence Fatality Reviews (DVFRs). Drawing on a practitioner–researcher perspective and a case study of Domestic Homicide Reviews (DHRs) in England and Wales, this paper’s originality stems from the author’s practitioner–researcher perspective. LGBTQ+ lives can be made (in)visible as a result of how in-scope deaths are identified, whether knowledge and expertise are included, and because of how the lives of LGBTQ+ victims are represented. This commentary explores how DVFRs can make LGBTQ+ lives (in)visible. Critically, however, it identifies how these considerations relate to broader questions, including the responses to LGBTQ+ domestic abuse generally and the functioning of DVFRs specifically, and also has implications for how researchers use the findings of review.

Journal of Family Violence
Durham University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.