Category Utilization Among Perceptually Ambiguous Groups: The Roles of Base Rates and Perceived Stigma

People often show a response bias when categorizing others as members of perceptually ambiguous groups. Specifically, perceivers are more likely to categorize individuals into a nonstigmatized group (e.g., straight) than a stigmatized group (e.g., gay). Previous work suggests that both perceived base rates and benevolent reasoning underlie this bias. However, no research has simultaneously examined both accounts to investigate their relative and combined effects. Across four studies, participants categorized unknown targets based solely on visual information. Studies 1A-2 used fictitious groups to manipulate perceived stigma and population base rates. These studies showed that base rates consistently biased categorizations, while group stigma did not. Study 3 conceptually replicated these effects with a group stigmatized in the real world. These findings suggest that population base rates play a robust role in category utilization for perceptually ambiguous groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Cognition
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2026.44.2.228
Primary Topic
Social and Intergroup Psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Category Utilization Among Perceptually Ambiguous Groups: The Roles of Base Rates and Perceived Stigma

Kurt Hugenberg, Robert J. Rydell, Edward R. Hirt, Tessa Benson‐Greenwald et al.
Social Cognition
Social and Intergroup Psychology
article

Category Utilization Among Perceptually Ambiguous Groups: The Roles of Base Rates and Perceived Stigma

Kurt Hugenberg, Robert J. Rydell, Edward R. Hirt, Tessa Benson‐Greenwald, Antonio G. Viera
article en

Abstract

People often show a response bias when categorizing others as members of perceptually ambiguous groups. Specifically, perceivers are more likely to categorize individuals into a nonstigmatized group (e.g., straight) than a stigmatized group (e.g., gay). Previous work suggests that both perceived base rates and benevolent reasoning underlie this bias. However, no research has simultaneously examined both accounts to investigate their relative and combined effects. Across four studies, participants categorized unknown targets based solely on visual information. Studies 1A-2 used fictitious groups to manipulate perceived stigma and population base rates. These studies showed that base rates consistently biased categorizations, while group stigma did not. Study 3 conceptually replicated these effects with a group stigmatized in the real world. These findings suggest that population base rates play a robust role in category utilization for perceptually ambiguous groups.

Social CognitionVol. 44(2)
University of Pittsburgh (US), Indiana University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Social and Intergroup Psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.