Saudi university EFL learners’ perceptions of native vs. non-native English speaking teachers: implications for native-speakerism and teacher recruitment

This study examined Saudi EFL students' perceptions of native English-speaking teachers (NESTs), non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs), and experienced teachers with formal teaching qualification. The research was conducted at (the target institute) and involved 78 students across three sections. Each section was co-taught by a Saudi NNEST and a NEST of American or British background. Data was collected through questionnaires. The findings indicate that student preferences were not random but systematic and task specific. For example, NESTs were perceived as more effective in teaching pronunciation, reflecting assumptions about superior accuracy and authenticity of native-like pronunciation. Teaching experience also emerged as a determining factor in explaining complex grammatical rules. However, NNESTs were consistently preferred for all core language skills, listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Moreover, this preference was extended to other categories, such as “Understanding me in class,” where more than two thirds of participants favored NNESTs, suggesting that the EFL students may value shared linguistic and cultural backgrounds over native-speaker status alone. The study further reveals a notable mismatch between student preferences and prevailing teacher recruitment practices in Saudi universities, which traditionally prioritize NESTs, highlighting the need to reconsider EFL teacher recruitment criteria to better align with student-centered realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1804279
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saudi university EFL learners’ perceptions of native vs. non-native English speaking teachers: implications for native-speakerism and teacher recruitment

Israa A Qari
Frontiers in Education
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Saudi university EFL learners’ perceptions of native vs. non-native English speaking teachers: implications for native-speakerism and teacher recruitment

Israa A Qari
article en

Abstract

This study examined Saudi EFL students' perceptions of native English-speaking teachers (NESTs), non-native English-speaking teachers (NNESTs), and experienced teachers with formal teaching qualification. The research was conducted at (the target institute) and involved 78 students across three sections. Each section was co-taught by a Saudi NNEST and a NEST of American or British background. Data was collected through questionnaires. The findings indicate that student preferences were not random but systematic and task specific. For example, NESTs were perceived as more effective in teaching pronunciation, reflecting assumptions about superior accuracy and authenticity of native-like pronunciation. Teaching experience also emerged as a determining factor in explaining complex grammatical rules. However, NNESTs were consistently preferred for all core language skills, listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Moreover, this preference was extended to other categories, such as “Understanding me in class,” where more than two thirds of participants favored NNESTs, suggesting that the EFL students may value shared linguistic and cultural backgrounds over native-speaker status alone. The study further reveals a notable mismatch between student preferences and prevailing teacher recruitment practices in Saudi universities, which traditionally prioritize NESTs, highlighting the need to reconsider EFL teacher recruitment criteria to better align with student-centered realities.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.