Carnapian Inductive Logic for Exponential Smoothing

Abstract This paper explores the inductive logic associated with exponential smoothing, the most widely used predictive rule that manifests the idea that more recent observations have a stronger influence on predictive probabilities than more remote ones. The main result shows that exponential smoothing can be derived from a set of plausible qualitative invariance assumptions about conditional probabilities. I discuss various aspects of the resulting inductive logic, including its connections to exchangeable processes, to Bayesian predictive inference and kernel methods in machine learning, as well as the philosophy of probabilistic invariance conditions and symmetries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10197
Primary Topic
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Carnapian Inductive Logic for Exponential Smoothing

Simon M. Huttegger
Philosophy of Science
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
article

Carnapian Inductive Logic for Exponential Smoothing

Simon M. Huttegger
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper explores the inductive logic associated with exponential smoothing, the most widely used predictive rule that manifests the idea that more recent observations have a stronger influence on predictive probabilities than more remote ones. The main result shows that exponential smoothing can be derived from a set of plausible qualitative invariance assumptions about conditional probabilities. I discuss various aspects of the resulting inductive logic, including its connections to exchangeable processes, to Bayesian predictive inference and kernel methods in machine learning, as well as the philosophy of probabilistic invariance conditions and symmetries.

Philosophy of Science
University of California, Irvine (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.