Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Measurement and Policy Considerations for the Veterans Health Administration

OBJECTIVE: To establish methods for comparing Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-direct and VA-purchased "community care" (CC) for methadone medication for opioid use disorder (M-MOUD), and determine differences in access, quality, and cost. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Three outcome measures were constructed: wait times (from clinician referral to appointment) for access, retention on M-MOUD (number of months, from one to six) for quality, and 6-month treatment costs (M-MOUD and related services). We used generalized linear models to estimate differences in each outcome for CC versus VA. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: VA electronic health record and CC claims. Our study included VA patients referred by clinicians for M-MOUD between April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024 in VA (n = 389) and CC (n = 219) and, secondarily, VA walk-ins (n = 1830). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Average unadjusted wait times from clinician referral to appointment were 15.73 days (standard deviation [SD] = 16.27) in VA and 19.03 days (SD = 19.12) in CC, while there was no wait time for Veterans seen as VA walk-ins. Average unadjusted M-MOUD retention was 2.07 months (SD = 1.65) in VA and 3.13 months (SD = 1.84) in CC. Average unadjusted 6-month costs were $7360 (SD = $9554) in VA and $4376 (SD = $2171) in CC. In adjusted models, CC had greater M-MOUD retention (1.07 months longer, p < 0.0001) and lower costs ($-1720, p < 0.05) compared to VA clinician referral; wait times did not statistically differ (p = 0.12). M-MOUD retention and cost patterns did not change when considering VA walk-ins. CONCLUSIONS: An important option for expanding Veterans' access to M-MOUD is through CC. In this group of Veterans receiving M-MOUD, CC retention was greater and costs were lower. However, CC lacks the walk-in option for same-day access. This signals tradeoffs to consider when assessing the balance between VA and CC and provides methods for comparing VA and CC treatment options.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Services Research
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.70114
Primary Topic
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Measurement and Policy Considerations for the Veterans Health Administration

Megan E. Vanneman, Audrey L. Jones, Megan E. Amuan, R. L. Nelson et al.
Health Services Research
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
article

Expanding Access to Methadone Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder: Measurement and Policy Considerations for the Veterans Health Administration

Megan E. Vanneman, Audrey L. Jones, Megan E. Amuan, R. L. Nelson, Adam J. Gordon
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish methods for comparing Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)-direct and VA-purchased "community care" (CC) for methadone medication for opioid use disorder (M-MOUD), and determine differences in access, quality, and cost. STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN: Three outcome measures were constructed: wait times (from clinician referral to appointment) for access, retention on M-MOUD (number of months, from one to six) for quality, and 6-month treatment costs (M-MOUD and related services). We used generalized linear models to estimate differences in each outcome for CC versus VA. DATA SOURCES AND ANALYTIC SAMPLE: VA electronic health record and CC claims. Our study included VA patients referred by clinicians for M-MOUD between April 1, 2023-March 31, 2024 in VA (n = 389) and CC (n = 219) and, secondarily, VA walk-ins (n = 1830). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Average unadjusted wait times from clinician referral to appointment were 15.73 days (standard deviation [SD] = 16.27) in VA and 19.03 days (SD = 19.12) in CC, while there was no wait time for Veterans seen as VA walk-ins. Average unadjusted M-MOUD retention was 2.07 months (SD = 1.65) in VA and 3.13 months (SD = 1.84) in CC. Average unadjusted 6-month costs were $7360 (SD = $9554) in VA and $4376 (SD = $2171) in CC. In adjusted models, CC had greater M-MOUD retention (1.07 months longer, p < 0.0001) and lower costs ($-1720, p < 0.05) compared to VA clinician referral; wait times did not statistically differ (p = 0.12). M-MOUD retention and cost patterns did not change when considering VA walk-ins. CONCLUSIONS: An important option for expanding Veterans' access to M-MOUD is through CC. In this group of Veterans receiving M-MOUD, CC retention was greater and costs were lower. However, CC lacks the walk-in option for same-day access. This signals tradeoffs to consider when assessing the balance between VA and CC and provides methods for comparing VA and CC treatment options.

Health Services ResearchVol. 61(2)
Emory University (US), Spencer Foundation (US), VA Salt Lake City Healthcare System (US)
Health Services Research and Development, Quality Enhancement Research Initiative
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.