Analysis of the development of modifying loss functions in label-noise environments

In recent years, the rapid advance of artificial intelligence has intensified interest in deep learning. However, during the training process of deep learning, the paper found that it is often susceptible to label noise. It biases models and severely degrades performance. And due to the complexity of the sources and classifications of label noise, it increases the difficulty of solving the problem of label noise. Current countermeasures cluster into three streams—supervised sample selection, robust architectures, and loss-function redesign. This review focuses exclusively on the last stream, surveying loss-function innovations proposed between 2015 and 2025. The paper identifies unresolved challenges in current research—such as over-reliance on idealized noise assumptions, dependence on clean validation sets, and so on. The paper also provides promising future directions, including self-calibrating losses without clean data, differentiable meta-loss layers for hyper-parameters, etc. By consolidating this evolving landscape, the survey offers practical guidance for mitigating label noise and charts a roadmap for future research that could sustain the long-term progress of deep learning.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2026-04-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20268401004/pdf
Primary Topic
Machine Learning and Data Classification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the development of modifying loss functions in label-noise environments

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Machine Learning and Data Classification
article

Analysis of the development of modifying loss functions in label-noise environments

article en

Abstract

In recent years, the rapid advance of artificial intelligence has intensified interest in deep learning. However, during the training process of deep learning, the paper found that it is often susceptible to label noise. It biases models and severely degrades performance. And due to the complexity of the sources and classifications of label noise, it increases the difficulty of solving the problem of label noise. Current countermeasures cluster into three streams—supervised sample selection, robust architectures, and loss-function redesign. This review focuses exclusively on the last stream, surveying loss-function innovations proposed between 2015 and 2025. The paper identifies unresolved challenges in current research—such as over-reliance on idealized noise assumptions, dependence on clean validation sets, and so on. The paper also provides promising future directions, including self-calibrating losses without clean data, differentiable meta-loss layers for hyper-parameters, etc. By consolidating this evolving landscape, the survey offers practical guidance for mitigating label noise and charts a roadmap for future research that could sustain the long-term progress of deep learning.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Machine Learning and Data Classification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.