Developing an Ideal Health Equity Index: characteristics, challenges and perspectives from three Southeast Asian countries

Health disparities are a multi-faceted issue, with the accessibility of healthcare services accounting for only a part of human well-being. Health equity – the opportunity for everyone to attain their highest level of health – involves considerations of healthcare systems, health outcomes and contextual factors such as Social Determinants of Health. There is a growing recognition of the role of contextual, structural and social factors in shaping population health – as well as the need to measure inequities in health to guide systems-level interventions. However, no global consensus exists on measuring health equity within and beyond health systems. Limited data collection practices also pose challenges to cross-sectoral, holistic measurements of health equity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. We propose some key ideal characteristics for Health Equity Indices (HEI): (1) a comprehensive perspective, (2) appropriate data formatting and quality, (3) adaptability, (4) consensus-based mechanisms, (5) transparency and (6) practicability. Based on focus group interviews with expert stakeholders in three Southeast Asian countries (Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam) common challenges in collecting data for health equity were identified. This research highlights the gap between the development of aspirational, cross-sectoral HEI to measure health equity and the data collection and feasibility challenges present in Southeast Asian LMICs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Public Health
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2026.2653384
Primary Topic
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing an Ideal Health Equity Index: characteristics, challenges and perspectives from three Southeast Asian countries

Jeremy J. Lim, Capucine Barcellona, Yzabel Bryanna Mariñas, Zaeen Nurhan Iqbal et al.
Critical Public Health
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
article

Developing an Ideal Health Equity Index: characteristics, challenges and perspectives from three Southeast Asian countries

Jeremy J. Lim, Capucine Barcellona, Yzabel Bryanna Mariñas, Zaeen Nurhan Iqbal, Rayner Kay Jin Tan
article en

Abstract

Health disparities are a multi-faceted issue, with the accessibility of healthcare services accounting for only a part of human well-being. Health equity – the opportunity for everyone to attain their highest level of health – involves considerations of healthcare systems, health outcomes and contextual factors such as Social Determinants of Health. There is a growing recognition of the role of contextual, structural and social factors in shaping population health – as well as the need to measure inequities in health to guide systems-level interventions. However, no global consensus exists on measuring health equity within and beyond health systems. Limited data collection practices also pose challenges to cross-sectoral, holistic measurements of health equity, especially in low- and middle-income countries. We propose some key ideal characteristics for Health Equity Indices (HEI): (1) a comprehensive perspective, (2) appropriate data formatting and quality, (3) adaptability, (4) consensus-based mechanisms, (5) transparency and (6) practicability. Based on focus group interviews with expert stakeholders in three Southeast Asian countries (Cambodia, Thailand and Vietnam) common challenges in collecting data for health equity were identified. This research highlights the gap between the development of aspirational, cross-sectoral HEI to measure health equity and the data collection and feasibility challenges present in Southeast Asian LMICs.

Critical Public HealthVol. 36(1)
National University of Singapore (SG), Yale-NUS College (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Healthcare Systems and Reforms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.