Evaluating the heterogeneous treatment effects of major depression polygenic risk scores on self-harm using causal forest

BACKGROUND: Self-harm, defined as non-fatal self-inflicted harm regardless of suicidal intent, is a critical global health issue influenced by the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. AIMS: This study investigates the causal effect of major depression polygenic risk scores (MD PRS) on self-harm in individuals of European ancestry and explores how environmental and personal factors moderate this effect. METHODS: Using data from 91,778 UK Biobank participants, we compared the top 10% with the highest MD PRS (the genetically vulnerable group) against the remainder. The causal relationship was examined using a causal forest approach to estimate average and heterogeneous treatment effects across non-genetic contributors. RESULTS: Higher MD PRS was associated with an increased risk of self-harm. Significant heterogeneity was observed: the association was stronger among individuals exposed to physical violence or partner belittlement, but weaker among older adults and those with higher income. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of personalized prevention. Genetic vulnerability to depression reflects a heightened sensitivity to adverse environments, suggesting that genetic risk should be considered alongside trauma and socioeconomic contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2645539
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the heterogeneous treatment effects of major depression polygenic risk scores on self-harm using causal forest

T. B. Tam Ha, Hyeona Yu, Hyo Shin Kang, Jakyung Lee et al.
Journal of Mental Health
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Evaluating the heterogeneous treatment effects of major depression polygenic risk scores on self-harm using causal forest

T. B. Tam Ha, Hyeona Yu, Hyo Shin Kang, Jakyung Lee, Woojae Myung, Chanhui Lee, Hong-Hee Won, Hyejin Kim, Eunji Jeong, Jungkyu Park
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Self-harm, defined as non-fatal self-inflicted harm regardless of suicidal intent, is a critical global health issue influenced by the interaction between genetic and environmental factors. AIMS: This study investigates the causal effect of major depression polygenic risk scores (MD PRS) on self-harm in individuals of European ancestry and explores how environmental and personal factors moderate this effect. METHODS: Using data from 91,778 UK Biobank participants, we compared the top 10% with the highest MD PRS (the genetically vulnerable group) against the remainder. The causal relationship was examined using a causal forest approach to estimate average and heterogeneous treatment effects across non-genetic contributors. RESULTS: Higher MD PRS was associated with an increased risk of self-harm. Significant heterogeneity was observed: the association was stronger among individuals exposed to physical violence or partner belittlement, but weaker among older adults and those with higher income. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the importance of personalized prevention. Genetic vulnerability to depression reflects a heightened sensitivity to adverse environments, suggesting that genetic risk should be considered alongside trauma and socioeconomic contexts.

Journal of Mental Health
Seoul National University (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Korea Health Industry Development Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.