Mpox knowledge, anxiety, and preventive behaviours in Jordan: a socio‑ecological perspective on vaccination and preparedness

Understanding how Jordanians perceive and respond to Mpox threat is vital for preventing future outbreaks. This study aims to assess the levels of Mpox-related knowledge, anxiety, and preventive behaviours among Jordanian adults, as well as to examine their willingness to accept Mpox vaccination. This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study that was carried out among adults in Jordan between July and November 2025. Composite knowledge, anxiety, and preventive practice scores were calculated by summing item responses. Scores were summarised using medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). The study included 819 participants, of which 305 (37.2%) were adults aged 18-24 and 549 (67.0%) were females. The knowledge and anxiety median scores were 9 (IQR: 8-10) and 8 (IQR: 5-11), respectively. Having higher knowledge (coefficient = 0.120, 95% CI 0.082-0.158) and anxiety scores (coefficient = 0.090); not receiving a monkeypox Mpox vaccine compared to being vaccinated (coefficient = -1.247); and being 18-24 years old compared to those older than 65 (coefficient = -0.734) were statistically associated with differences in preventive‑measures scores. Our sample demonstrated moderate‑to‑high levels of mpox‑related knowledge and anxiety. Targeted risk communication and vaccination campaigns are needed to correct misconceptions and address vaccine hesitancy towards mpox.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2026.2657446
Primary Topic
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mpox knowledge, anxiety, and preventive behaviours in Jordan: a socio‑ecological perspective on vaccination and preparedness

Ahmad Z. Al Meslamani, Dania Abu‐Naser, Eman Merghani Ali Mohammed
International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
article

Mpox knowledge, anxiety, and preventive behaviours in Jordan: a socio‑ecological perspective on vaccination and preparedness

Ahmad Z. Al Meslamani, Dania Abu‐Naser, Eman Merghani Ali Mohammed
article en

Abstract

Understanding how Jordanians perceive and respond to Mpox threat is vital for preventing future outbreaks. This study aims to assess the levels of Mpox-related knowledge, anxiety, and preventive behaviours among Jordanian adults, as well as to examine their willingness to accept Mpox vaccination. This is a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study that was carried out among adults in Jordan between July and November 2025. Composite knowledge, anxiety, and preventive practice scores were calculated by summing item responses. Scores were summarised using medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs). The study included 819 participants, of which 305 (37.2%) were adults aged 18-24 and 549 (67.0%) were females. The knowledge and anxiety median scores were 9 (IQR: 8-10) and 8 (IQR: 5-11), respectively. Having higher knowledge (coefficient = 0.120, 95% CI 0.082-0.158) and anxiety scores (coefficient = 0.090); not receiving a monkeypox Mpox vaccine compared to being vaccinated (coefficient = -1.247); and being 18-24 years old compared to those older than 65 (coefficient = -0.734) were statistically associated with differences in preventive‑measures scores. Our sample demonstrated moderate‑to‑high levels of mpox‑related knowledge and anxiety. Targeted risk communication and vaccination campaigns are needed to correct misconceptions and address vaccine hesitancy towards mpox.

International Journal of Environmental Health Research
Al Ain University (AE), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO), Jazan University (SA), Irbid National University (JO)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Poxvirus research and outbreaks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.