From Intensive Care to Recovery: Feasibility of a Randomised Controlled Study Design Evaluating a Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention for Critically Ill Patients

BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness frequently experience persistent cognitive impairment. However, structured cognitive rehabilitation interventions remain limited within intensive care pathways. While physical rehabilitation has received increasing attention, evidence guiding cognitive rehabilitation in intensive care unit (ICU) populations is sparse, and the feasibility of study procedures must be established before large-scale evaluation. AIM: To assess the feasibility of conducting a multi-arm randomised controlled trial evaluating a cognitive rehabilitation intervention (ICU CogHab) for ICU survivors. STUDY DESIGN: A pragmatic, five-arm randomised feasibility study was conducted across four ICUs at two Danish university hospitals. Feasibility outcomes included screening and recruitment, randomisation procedures, retention through 6-month follow-up and completion of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. Data were analysed descriptively to summarise feasibility parameters and outcome variability. RESULTS: Of 1679 patients screened, 115 met eligibility criteria and 83 were randomised. Recruitment was lower than anticipated, and retention at 6 months was 40%. Clinical data obtained from medical records were largely complete, whereas cognitive and patient-reported outcomes were more difficult to complete at ICU discharge. Outcome measures demonstrated substantial variability. CONCLUSION: This study shows that screening and randomisation procedures for a cognitive rehabilitation intervention are feasible within routine ICU practice. Retention and data completeness, particularly after hospital discharge, represent key challenges requiring refinement before further evaluation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Cognitive rehabilitation can be introduced within routine ICU workflows. However, the timing of assessments, follow-up procedures and integration into clinical practice require optimisation. These findings inform pragmatic adaptations to support future evaluation and implementation of cognitive rehabilitation for ICU survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/b57fv/overview).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing in Critical Care
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70490
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Intensive Care to Recovery: Feasibility of a Randomised Controlled Study Design Evaluating a Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention for Critically Ill Patients

Trine Haberlandt, Pia Dreyer, Nanna Rolving, Katrine Astrup et al.
Nursing in Critical Care
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

From Intensive Care to Recovery: Feasibility of a Randomised Controlled Study Design Evaluating a Cognitive Rehabilitation Intervention for Critically Ill Patients

Trine Haberlandt, Pia Dreyer, Nanna Rolving, Katrine Astrup, Mette Fogh Møller, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard, Rikke Sig
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survivors of critical illness frequently experience persistent cognitive impairment. However, structured cognitive rehabilitation interventions remain limited within intensive care pathways. While physical rehabilitation has received increasing attention, evidence guiding cognitive rehabilitation in intensive care unit (ICU) populations is sparse, and the feasibility of study procedures must be established before large-scale evaluation. AIM: To assess the feasibility of conducting a multi-arm randomised controlled trial evaluating a cognitive rehabilitation intervention (ICU CogHab) for ICU survivors. STUDY DESIGN: A pragmatic, five-arm randomised feasibility study was conducted across four ICUs at two Danish university hospitals. Feasibility outcomes included screening and recruitment, randomisation procedures, retention through 6-month follow-up and completion of patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures. Data were analysed descriptively to summarise feasibility parameters and outcome variability. RESULTS: Of 1679 patients screened, 115 met eligibility criteria and 83 were randomised. Recruitment was lower than anticipated, and retention at 6 months was 40%. Clinical data obtained from medical records were largely complete, whereas cognitive and patient-reported outcomes were more difficult to complete at ICU discharge. Outcome measures demonstrated substantial variability. CONCLUSION: This study shows that screening and randomisation procedures for a cognitive rehabilitation intervention are feasible within routine ICU practice. Retention and data completeness, particularly after hospital discharge, represent key challenges requiring refinement before further evaluation. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Cognitive rehabilitation can be introduced within routine ICU workflows. However, the timing of assessments, follow-up procedures and integration into clinical practice require optimisation. These findings inform pragmatic adaptations to support future evaluation and implementation of cognitive rehabilitation for ICU survivors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/b57fv/overview).

Nursing in Critical CareVol. 31(3)
University of Southern Denmark (DK), Aarhus University (DK), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Kolding Hospital (DK), Lillebaelt Hospital (DK)
Aarhus Universitet, Novo Nordisk Fonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.