Revisiting the Core of Policy Feedback Theory: A Systematic Review

ABSTRACT Policy feedback theory introduces the concept that “new policies create new politics” through feedback loops where policies reshape the political environment and influence future policy formulation. However, few studies have fully realized this initial promise, with limited attention being paid to the feedback loop. This study conducts a systematic review of 183 SSCI articles to assess the gap between current research and the original promise of policy feedback theory. Our analysis revealed three key findings: More than half of the articles did not address policy feedback loops, limiting the theory's potential; While the original framework provides a foundation for the discussion of mechanisms, misuses persist, and further exploration of the relationships between these mechanisms is required; The absence of feedback loops has left discussions on the self‐reinforcing and self‐undermining effects at an early stage. This study argues that future policy feedback research should more frequently treat policy as both the starting and ending points of analysis and calls for a deeper exploration of feedback mechanisms and their long‐term effects. By addressing these gaps, this study aims to refine the concept of policy feedback and enhance our understanding of the long‐term impacts of policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Policy Research
Published
2026-04-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70095
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Core of Policy Feedback Theory: A Systematic Review

J. Hong, Ciqi Mei
Review of Policy Research
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Revisiting the Core of Policy Feedback Theory: A Systematic Review

J. Hong, Ciqi Mei
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Policy feedback theory introduces the concept that “new policies create new politics” through feedback loops where policies reshape the political environment and influence future policy formulation. However, few studies have fully realized this initial promise, with limited attention being paid to the feedback loop. This study conducts a systematic review of 183 SSCI articles to assess the gap between current research and the original promise of policy feedback theory. Our analysis revealed three key findings: More than half of the articles did not address policy feedback loops, limiting the theory's potential; While the original framework provides a foundation for the discussion of mechanisms, misuses persist, and further exploration of the relationships between these mechanisms is required; The absence of feedback loops has left discussions on the self‐reinforcing and self‐undermining effects at an early stage. This study argues that future policy feedback research should more frequently treat policy as both the starting and ending points of analysis and calls for a deeper exploration of feedback mechanisms and their long‐term effects. By addressing these gaps, this study aims to refine the concept of policy feedback and enhance our understanding of the long‐term impacts of policies.

Review of Policy ResearchVol. 43(3)
Tsinghua University (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the Core of Policy Feedback Theory: A Systematic Review — J. Hong, Ciqi Mei · Review of Policy Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS