Intervention to improve kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To describe interventions aimed at improving kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease and provide an estimate of their effectiveness. A systematic review was conducted from 10 databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, APA-PsycInfo, CNKI, VIP, Sinomed, and WangFang to identify all randomized controlled trials that were published from the time of database creation through August 2024. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for quality assessment and RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 for data syntheses. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also conducted. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (N = 1408) were included. Interventions to improve kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease include cognitive behavioral interventions, psychological interventions, exercise interventions, multi-modal combined interventions, online and offline of home rehabilitation, and Preoperative Physical Therapy, and all interventions were effective(P < 0.01).These interventions were statistically significant at 1–2 months(SMD=-1.75; 95% CI=-2.16, -1.34), 3 months(SMD=-2.04; 95% CI=-2.66, -1.42), and 6 months(SMD = -4.90; 95% CI = -7.59, -2.20), there was no difference in kinesiophobia between 1 and 3 months after the intervention. These Interventions to reduce patients’ kinesiophobia can also promote the overall improvement of psychological status, cardiac function, exercise capacity, and quality of life(P < 0.01). Although publication bias was detected, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled results. Six intervention modalities identified across 16 included studies were effective in reducing kinesiophobia and demonstrated beneficial short- to mid-term effects. Early identification and intervention targeting kinesiophobia may improve psychological well-being and functional recovery. Further reduction may require individualized approaches and hybrid rehabilitation models combining tele- and center-based strategies. Future standardized, high-quality randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify long-term effectiveness and support personalized rehabilitation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-026-05812-x
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intervention to improve kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hong Tang, Yue Kuang, Lingqiao Gong, Xue Chen et al.
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Intervention to improve kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Hong Tang, Yue Kuang, Lingqiao Gong, Xue Chen, Panpan Xu
article en

Abstract

To describe interventions aimed at improving kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease and provide an estimate of their effectiveness. A systematic review was conducted from 10 databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Embase, APA-PsycInfo, CNKI, VIP, Sinomed, and WangFang to identify all randomized controlled trials that were published from the time of database creation through August 2024. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by two researchers. Using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for quality assessment and RevMan 5.4 and Stata 15.0 for data syntheses. Subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were also conducted. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. A total of 16 randomized controlled trials (N = 1408) were included. Interventions to improve kinesiophobia in patients with coronary artery disease include cognitive behavioral interventions, psychological interventions, exercise interventions, multi-modal combined interventions, online and offline of home rehabilitation, and Preoperative Physical Therapy, and all interventions were effective(P < 0.01).These interventions were statistically significant at 1–2 months(SMD=-1.75; 95% CI=-2.16, -1.34), 3 months(SMD=-2.04; 95% CI=-2.66, -1.42), and 6 months(SMD = -4.90; 95% CI = -7.59, -2.20), there was no difference in kinesiophobia between 1 and 3 months after the intervention. These Interventions to reduce patients’ kinesiophobia can also promote the overall improvement of psychological status, cardiac function, exercise capacity, and quality of life(P < 0.01). Although publication bias was detected, sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of pooled results. Six intervention modalities identified across 16 included studies were effective in reducing kinesiophobia and demonstrated beneficial short- to mid-term effects. Early identification and intervention targeting kinesiophobia may improve psychological well-being and functional recovery. Further reduction may require individualized approaches and hybrid rehabilitation models combining tele- and center-based strategies. Future standardized, high-quality randomized controlled trials with extended follow-up are needed to clarify long-term effectiveness and support personalized rehabilitation strategies.

BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Jilin University (CN), Daping Hospital (CN), People 's Hospital of Jilin Province (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Jilin University (CN), Chongqing Dazu District People's Hospital (CN), Changchun University (CN)
Jilin Department of Health, Education Department of Jilin Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.