Evaluating Arctic sea ice and snow thickness simulations: methodological insights from MOSAiC and CMIP6 data

The Arctic sea ice cover and thickness have rapidly declined in recent years, with snow cover on sea ice playing a key role in driving this variability and trend. Arctic sea ice and snow properties also strongly regulate heat and momentum exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, making their accurate representation in climate models essential. Yet in situ observations of Arctic sea ice and snow thickness are scarce. The year-long Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition provided valuable, high-resolution measurements of these properties, but this dataset is short-term and localized compared to the observational products typically used for model evaluation. We examine whether free-running climate model simulations can be meaningfully compared to point observations, such as those from MOSAiC, to assess model performance. To address this, we employ multiple methodological approaches to generate representative seasonal cycles of simulated snow and sea ice thickness: a standard 30-year climatology, two proxy-year methods (based on sea ice area (SIA) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO) index), atmospherically nudged simulations, and a Monte Carlo random-year benchmark. We find that the SIA-based proxy method performs comparably to the 30-year climatology. In contrast, the AO-based proxy method reduces bias relative to the SIA method for snow thickness comparisons. However, both methods nevertheless fail to accurately reproduce the amplitude of the observed snow thickness cycle, suggesting unresolved processes in models. Overall, these findings show potential for snow and sea ice evaluation against localized measurements and demonstrate that proxy methods can provide viable alternatives when nudging or direct temporal overlaps are unavailable. Finally, this study highlights the need for an improved representation of modeled sea ice and snow processes to enhance the next generation of global climate models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Earth Science
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2026.1744420
Primary Topic
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Arctic sea ice and snow thickness simulations: methodological insights from MOSAiC and CMIP6 data

Tido Semmler, Shreya Trivedi, Marylou Athanase, Antonio Sánchez-Benítez et al.
Frontiers in Earth Science
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
article

Evaluating Arctic sea ice and snow thickness simulations: methodological insights from MOSAiC and CMIP6 data

Tido Semmler, Shreya Trivedi, Marylou Athanase, Antonio Sánchez-Benítez, Imke Sievers
article en

Abstract

The Arctic sea ice cover and thickness have rapidly declined in recent years, with snow cover on sea ice playing a key role in driving this variability and trend. Arctic sea ice and snow properties also strongly regulate heat and momentum exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, making their accurate representation in climate models essential. Yet in situ observations of Arctic sea ice and snow thickness are scarce. The year-long Multidisciplinary drifting Observatory for the Study of Arctic Climate (MOSAiC) expedition provided valuable, high-resolution measurements of these properties, but this dataset is short-term and localized compared to the observational products typically used for model evaluation. We examine whether free-running climate model simulations can be meaningfully compared to point observations, such as those from MOSAiC, to assess model performance. To address this, we employ multiple methodological approaches to generate representative seasonal cycles of simulated snow and sea ice thickness: a standard 30-year climatology, two proxy-year methods (based on sea ice area (SIA) and the Arctic Oscillation (AO) index), atmospherically nudged simulations, and a Monte Carlo random-year benchmark. We find that the SIA-based proxy method performs comparably to the 30-year climatology. In contrast, the AO-based proxy method reduces bias relative to the SIA method for snow thickness comparisons. However, both methods nevertheless fail to accurately reproduce the amplitude of the observed snow thickness cycle, suggesting unresolved processes in models. Overall, these findings show potential for snow and sea ice evaluation against localized measurements and demonstrate that proxy methods can provide viable alternatives when nudging or direct temporal overlaps are unavailable. Finally, this study highlights the need for an improved representation of modeled sea ice and snow processes to enhance the next generation of global climate models.

Frontiers in Earth ScienceVol. 14
Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung (DE), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), Danish Meteorological Institute (DK), Met Éireann (IE)
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Deutsches Klimarechenzentrum
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.