Level of Personality Functioning in Turkish Clinical and Community Samples: Validation of the LPFS‐SR‐TR and Its Associations With Axis I Disorders

This study examines the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR-TR) and its associations with personality disorder (PD) categories and Axis I comorbidities. The cross-sectional study included 720 participants aged 18-65. From a consecutive sample of 732 patients who presented to the outpatient psychiatry clinic, experienced psychiatrists suspected 207 of having PD. They were further diagnosed using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Patients were also investigated for Axis I disorders using the SCID-5 clinical version. A community-based control group of 513 participants recruited through convenience sampling received self-assessment-based SCID-II without a clinical interview. Both groups underwent the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and LPFS-SR-TR. The six-factor model provided the best statistical fit. Significant correlations between the LPFS-SR-TR and BFI indicate concurrent validity. Patients scored higher on the LPFS-SR-TR. Using a total score threshold of greater than 277.5 resulted in 93.2% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity (AUC = 0.94) for identifying PDs, indicating discriminant validity. Serial logistic models suggested incremental validity. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). The LPFS-SR-TR is valid and reliable for assessing the presence and severity of PDs. The hypothesized one-dimensional factor structure may be supported given its ability to distinguish PDs from a community sample. Axis I comorbidities are common and diverse without any discernible pattern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Personality and Mental Health
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pmh.70076
Primary Topic
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Level of Personality Functioning in Turkish Clinical and Community Samples: Validation of the LPFS‐SR‐TR and Its Associations With Axis I Disorders

Neslihan Kara, S Cangür, Numan Konuk, Begüm Yaman Özcan
Personality and Mental Health
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
article

Level of Personality Functioning in Turkish Clinical and Community Samples: Validation of the LPFS‐SR‐TR and Its Associations With Axis I Disorders

Neslihan Kara, S Cangür, Numan Konuk, Begüm Yaman Özcan
article en

Abstract

This study examines the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Level of Personality Functioning Scale-Self-Report (LPFS-SR-TR) and its associations with personality disorder (PD) categories and Axis I comorbidities. The cross-sectional study included 720 participants aged 18-65. From a consecutive sample of 732 patients who presented to the outpatient psychiatry clinic, experienced psychiatrists suspected 207 of having PD. They were further diagnosed using the structured clinical interview for DSM-III-R personality disorders (SCID-II). Patients were also investigated for Axis I disorders using the SCID-5 clinical version. A community-based control group of 513 participants recruited through convenience sampling received self-assessment-based SCID-II without a clinical interview. Both groups underwent the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and LPFS-SR-TR. The six-factor model provided the best statistical fit. Significant correlations between the LPFS-SR-TR and BFI indicate concurrent validity. Patients scored higher on the LPFS-SR-TR. Using a total score threshold of greater than 277.5 resulted in 93.2% sensitivity and 83.0% specificity (AUC = 0.94) for identifying PDs, indicating discriminant validity. Serial logistic models suggested incremental validity. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.96) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). The LPFS-SR-TR is valid and reliable for assessing the presence and severity of PDs. The hypothesized one-dimensional factor structure may be supported given its ability to distinguish PDs from a community sample. Axis I comorbidities are common and diverse without any discernible pattern.

Personality and Mental HealthVol. 20(2)
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa (TR), Düzce Üniversitesi (TR), Istanbul University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.