Characterizing healthcare provider experiences delivering genomic testing in a Federally Qualified Health Center

BACKGROUND: To maximize the potential benefits of genomic medicine for all, it is crucial to research and support the delivery of genomic medicine in under-researched healthcare settings. METHODS: This project investigated experiences of healthcare providers caring for low-resourced patients in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona (FQHC) using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional case study. Interviews were conducted with 14 healthcare providers working in a FQHC, involved with delivering genomic testing (specifically, polygenic risk scores [PRS] and monogenic testing) to patients enrolled in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network, specifically the eMERGE IV study. RESULTS: Providers expressed a general confidence in genomic testing in practice. Quantitatively, most providers expressed confidence in communicating genomic test results to patients. However, qualitative findings emphasize time constraints, insufficient training, lack of human resources, and concerns for follow-up care and financial barriers, which are pronounced in FQHC settings. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of genomic testing to improve patient outcomes is strong, but system-level support for providers is necessary to strive towards sustainable and equitable implementation of genomic medicine, particularly in FQHC and other under-resourced primary care settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Medicine
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-026-01579-6
Primary Topic
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterizing healthcare provider experiences delivering genomic testing in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Gabriel Q. Shaibi, Allison N. Williams, Richard R. Sharp, Rachel Gur‐Arie et al.
Communications Medicine
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
article

Characterizing healthcare provider experiences delivering genomic testing in a Federally Qualified Health Center

Gabriel Q. Shaibi, Allison N. Williams, Richard R. Sharp, Rachel Gur‐Arie, Rodolfo Daniel Aguilar Quijada, Crystal Gonzalez, Valentina Hernandez, Davinder P. Singh
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To maximize the potential benefits of genomic medicine for all, it is crucial to research and support the delivery of genomic medicine in under-researched healthcare settings. METHODS: This project investigated experiences of healthcare providers caring for low-resourced patients in a Federally Qualified Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona (FQHC) using a mixed-methods, cross-sectional case study. Interviews were conducted with 14 healthcare providers working in a FQHC, involved with delivering genomic testing (specifically, polygenic risk scores [PRS] and monogenic testing) to patients enrolled in the electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) network, specifically the eMERGE IV study. RESULTS: Providers expressed a general confidence in genomic testing in practice. Quantitatively, most providers expressed confidence in communicating genomic test results to patients. However, qualitative findings emphasize time constraints, insufficient training, lack of human resources, and concerns for follow-up care and financial barriers, which are pronounced in FQHC settings. CONCLUSIONS: The potential of genomic testing to improve patient outcomes is strong, but system-level support for providers is necessary to strive towards sustainable and equitable implementation of genomic medicine, particularly in FQHC and other under-resourced primary care settings.

Communications Medicine
Mayo Clinic (US), Mountain Park Health Center (US), Arizona State University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
BRCA gene mutations in cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.