Integrating InSAR and Channel Steepness for AI-Based Coseismic Landslide Modeling in the Nepal Himalaya

Earthquake-induced landslides in active orogens such as the Nepal Himalaya pose severe threats to lives, infrastructure, and post-disaster recovery. While machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches to coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping have advanced considerably, spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) products, particularly line-of-sight (LOS) displacement and coherence-based damage proxy maps (DPMs), remain underutilized in event-based frameworks. This study develops and evaluates a multi-factor coseismic landslide probability model that integrates InSAR-derived deformation metrics with geomorphic and hydrologic predictors to support rapid post-earthquake hazard assessment. Using the 25 April 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake as a case study, LOS displacement was derived from ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 ScanSAR interferometry, and the normalized channel steepness index (Ksn) was computed from a digital elevation model. Fourteen conditioning factors were used to train five architectures: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CNN, U-Net, and DeepLabV3. Spatial autocorrelation was mitigated using a leave-one-basin-out three-fold spatial cross-validation strategy, with models evaluated on a patch-based domain comprising 655,360 pixels at a positive-class prevalence of 6.35%, establishing a no-skill AUC-PR baseline of 0.0635. InSAR integration consistently improved model performance under high class imbalance, increasing AUC-PR across all models by 7.8% to 17.3%. Random Forest achieved the highest AUC-PR (0.7940, nearly 12.5 times the baseline) and CSI (0.3027), providing the best balance between landslide recall (88.09%) and non-landslide specificity (88.68%) with the lowest false alarm rate (11.32%). XGBoost attained the highest AUC-ROC (0.9501) but exhibited lower recall (83.73%) and poorer calibration (Brier = 0.1397). Among DL models, DeepLabV3 produced the best-calibrated probabilities (Brier = 0.0693) and the highest CSI (0.2307), while U-Net offered the most balanced DL performance and CNN achieved the highest recall (92.40%) at the expense of elevated false alarms. Permutation feature importance identified Ksn as the dominant predictor, highlighting the strong tectono-geomorphic control on coseismic landslide occurrence. These results demonstrate that integrating InSAR-derived products substantially enhances landslide hazard assessment and supports more reliable rapid response in the Nepal Himalaya.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18081151
Primary Topic
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating InSAR and Channel Steepness for AI-Based Coseismic Landslide Modeling in the Nepal Himalaya

G. Wang, Rajesh Silwal, Sunil Rawal, Rabin Rimal et al.
Remote Sensing
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
article

Integrating InSAR and Channel Steepness for AI-Based Coseismic Landslide Modeling in the Nepal Himalaya

G. Wang, Rajesh Silwal, Sunil Rawal, Rabin Rimal, Sabal KC
article en

Abstract

Earthquake-induced landslides in active orogens such as the Nepal Himalaya pose severe threats to lives, infrastructure, and post-disaster recovery. While machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) approaches to coseismic landslide susceptibility mapping have advanced considerably, spaceborne interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) products, particularly line-of-sight (LOS) displacement and coherence-based damage proxy maps (DPMs), remain underutilized in event-based frameworks. This study develops and evaluates a multi-factor coseismic landslide probability model that integrates InSAR-derived deformation metrics with geomorphic and hydrologic predictors to support rapid post-earthquake hazard assessment. Using the 25 April 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha earthquake as a case study, LOS displacement was derived from ALOS-2 PALSAR-2 ScanSAR interferometry, and the normalized channel steepness index (Ksn) was computed from a digital elevation model. Fourteen conditioning factors were used to train five architectures: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, CNN, U-Net, and DeepLabV3. Spatial autocorrelation was mitigated using a leave-one-basin-out three-fold spatial cross-validation strategy, with models evaluated on a patch-based domain comprising 655,360 pixels at a positive-class prevalence of 6.35%, establishing a no-skill AUC-PR baseline of 0.0635. InSAR integration consistently improved model performance under high class imbalance, increasing AUC-PR across all models by 7.8% to 17.3%. Random Forest achieved the highest AUC-PR (0.7940, nearly 12.5 times the baseline) and CSI (0.3027), providing the best balance between landslide recall (88.09%) and non-landslide specificity (88.68%) with the lowest false alarm rate (11.32%). XGBoost attained the highest AUC-ROC (0.9501) but exhibited lower recall (83.73%) and poorer calibration (Brier = 0.1397). Among DL models, DeepLabV3 produced the best-calibrated probabilities (Brier = 0.0693) and the highest CSI (0.2307), while U-Net offered the most balanced DL performance and CNN achieved the highest recall (92.40%) at the expense of elevated false alarms. Permutation feature importance identified Ksn as the dominant predictor, highlighting the strong tectono-geomorphic control on coseismic landslide occurrence. These results demonstrate that integrating InSAR-derived products substantially enhances landslide hazard assessment and supports more reliable rapid response in the Nepal Himalaya.

Remote SensingVol. 18(8)
National Society for Earthquake Technology (NP), University of Houston (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.