Intersectional inequalities in healthcare utilisation in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA)

Residents of informal settlements face significant intersectional inequalities, due to the overlapping and compounding effects of multiple social factors. This study aims to explore how these intersecting social factors, identified by community members, combine to shape household-level inequalities healthcare utilisation (HU) among residents of informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone. This study employed participatory action research to collaboratively identify key social determinants affecting healthcare utilisation in Freetown’s informal settlements. A cross-sectional health and wellbeing survey was implemented in April-May 2023 and collected data from 4,871 households in Cockle Bay, Dwazark, and Moyiba informal settlements. The survey questions were codesigned by researchers and community fieldworkers, informed by prior qualitative research. Two outcomes were analysed: HU within the settlement (n = 4,821), and outside the settlement (n = 4,616). A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) was conducted, nesting households within 122 intersectional strata. These strata were defined by six social factors: head of household gender, marital composition, engagement in income-generating activity, food security, disability and the household’s settlement. Intersectional measures included variance partition coefficient (VPC), the proportional change in variance (PCV), and residual intersectional effects. VPCs of 0.9% (PCV, of 92.8%) for HU within the settlements and of 3.9% (PCV, 81.7%) for HU outside the informal settlements suggest moderate but meaningful intersectional effects in shaping HU inequalities. The lowest levels of HU within informal settlements were observed among single, male, disabled individuals in Moyiba who lacked income-generating activities and experienced food insecurity. For HU outside the settlement, the lowest levels were found among female-headed households in Moyiba who were married, cohabiting, or engaged with a disabled household member, experienced food insecurity, and were engaged in income-generating activities. This study identifies and quantifies inequalities in HU at the household level across three informal settlements in Freetown, driven by intersecting social factors. Addressing these inequalities requires policies that are universally accessible but implemented with an intensity proportionate to the level of vulnerability, ensuring that support is targeted to those most in need. The findings identify and quantify intersectional inequalities in healthcare utilisation (HU), particularly among the most vulnerable groups. Single women without income and single men with disabilities and no income in Moyiba were less likely to utilise healthcare. Households with protective factors against illness showed higher HU than those exposed to illness-enabling conditions. Stakeholders are encouraged to address HU inequalities through social security and health insurance, proportionately targeted by level of need.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Equity in Health
Published
2026-04-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-026-02851-w
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersectional inequalities in healthcare utilisation in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA)

Bintu Mansaray, Noêmia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, Sia Morenike Tengbe, Braima Koroma et al.
International Journal for Equity in Health
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Intersectional inequalities in healthcare utilisation in informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone: a multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA)

Bintu Mansaray, Noêmia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha, Sia Morenike Tengbe, Braima Koroma, Joseph Macarthy, Neele Wiltgen Georgi, Samira Sesay, Helen Elsey, Ibrahim Gandi, Francis Refell, Eliud Kibuchi, Motto Nganda, Abu Conteh, Samuel Saidu, Ibrahim Juldeh Sesay, Sullaiman Fullah, Dora Vangahun, Haja Wurie-Kamara, Lana Whittaker, Rajith Lakshman, Alastair H. Leyland, Laura Dean, Rachel Tolhurst
article en

Abstract

Residents of informal settlements face significant intersectional inequalities, due to the overlapping and compounding effects of multiple social factors. This study aims to explore how these intersecting social factors, identified by community members, combine to shape household-level inequalities healthcare utilisation (HU) among residents of informal settlements in Freetown, Sierra Leone. This study employed participatory action research to collaboratively identify key social determinants affecting healthcare utilisation in Freetown’s informal settlements. A cross-sectional health and wellbeing survey was implemented in April-May 2023 and collected data from 4,871 households in Cockle Bay, Dwazark, and Moyiba informal settlements. The survey questions were codesigned by researchers and community fieldworkers, informed by prior qualitative research. Two outcomes were analysed: HU within the settlement (n = 4,821), and outside the settlement (n = 4,616). A multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) was conducted, nesting households within 122 intersectional strata. These strata were defined by six social factors: head of household gender, marital composition, engagement in income-generating activity, food security, disability and the household’s settlement. Intersectional measures included variance partition coefficient (VPC), the proportional change in variance (PCV), and residual intersectional effects. VPCs of 0.9% (PCV, of 92.8%) for HU within the settlements and of 3.9% (PCV, 81.7%) for HU outside the informal settlements suggest moderate but meaningful intersectional effects in shaping HU inequalities. The lowest levels of HU within informal settlements were observed among single, male, disabled individuals in Moyiba who lacked income-generating activities and experienced food insecurity. For HU outside the settlement, the lowest levels were found among female-headed households in Moyiba who were married, cohabiting, or engaged with a disabled household member, experienced food insecurity, and were engaged in income-generating activities. This study identifies and quantifies inequalities in HU at the household level across three informal settlements in Freetown, driven by intersecting social factors. Addressing these inequalities requires policies that are universally accessible but implemented with an intensity proportionate to the level of vulnerability, ensuring that support is targeted to those most in need. The findings identify and quantify intersectional inequalities in healthcare utilisation (HU), particularly among the most vulnerable groups. Single women without income and single men with disabilities and no income in Moyiba were less likely to utilise healthcare. Households with protective factors against illness showed higher HU than those exposed to illness-enabling conditions. Stakeholders are encouraged to address HU inequalities through social security and health insurance, proportionately targeted by level of need.

International Journal for Equity in Health
University of Sierra Leone (SL), Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (GB), Institute of Development Studies (GB), Institute of Development Studies (IN), Sierra Leone Urban Research Centre (SL), Hull York Medical School (GB), University of Glasgow (GB)
Medical Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.