You Shall Not Pass: Historical Origins and Modern Solutions to Public-Private Land-Use Conflict

As increasing populations and competing interests have exacerbated the historic conflict between public and private interests in land, cooperation, as well as a potential shift in public policy, may need to be considered. But for these shifts to occur, any predicate that private property rights should be somehow stronger or more easily enforced than that of the public to access land owned by a state or the federal government should be challenged. This Comment will analyze the historical events that led to a significant shift in land ownership and use conflicts in the American West. The historical element will focus on the Homestead Act of 1862 and the Fence Cutting Wars in Wyoming and Texas. The different reactions to these early conflicts, which include the Unlawful Inclosures Act, will be analyzed, as well as legal solutions and examples of collaborative approaches that have been implemented in other states. Even in states where land has already been privatized, sometimes through illegal means, there are still ways for landowners and states to maintain or even increase public access opportunities and mitigate the negative impacts of land privatization and subdivision.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Texas A&M Journal of Property Law
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37419/jpl.v12.i3.5
Primary Topic
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

You Shall Not Pass: Historical Origins and Modern Solutions to Public-Private Land-Use Conflict

Alexander Dye
Texas A&M Journal of Property Law
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
article

You Shall Not Pass: Historical Origins and Modern Solutions to Public-Private Land-Use Conflict

Alexander Dye
article en

Abstract

As increasing populations and competing interests have exacerbated the historic conflict between public and private interests in land, cooperation, as well as a potential shift in public policy, may need to be considered. But for these shifts to occur, any predicate that private property rights should be somehow stronger or more easily enforced than that of the public to access land owned by a state or the federal government should be challenged. This Comment will analyze the historical events that led to a significant shift in land ownership and use conflicts in the American West. The historical element will focus on the Homestead Act of 1862 and the Fence Cutting Wars in Wyoming and Texas. The different reactions to these early conflicts, which include the Unlawful Inclosures Act, will be analyzed, as well as legal solutions and examples of collaborative approaches that have been implemented in other states. Even in states where land has already been privatized, sometimes through illegal means, there are still ways for landowners and states to maintain or even increase public access opportunities and mitigate the negative impacts of land privatization and subdivision.

Texas A&M Journal of Property LawVol. 12(3)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Property Rights and Legal Doctrine
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.