Using a questionnaire-based approach to determine alignment of a digital capability framework for health and social care to the MPharm degree programme at Queen’s University Belfast

Abstract Introduction The All-Ireland Digital Capability Framework (AIDCF) for Health and Social Care has been developed given the need for healthcare professionals to demonstrate appropriate levels of digital competency across multiple domains of their practice.[1] Moreover, the 2021 Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists require students to use ‘digital technologies to improve clinical outcomes.’[2] As there is no national digital capability syllabus for MPharm programmes, it is important to compare our content to the AIDCF. Aim To map the AIDCF to the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) MPharm Degree Programme, ascertaining alignment, and enabling relevant gaps to be identified and quantified. Methods AIDCF[1] domains were redesigned into a questionnaire without changing wording. Yes/no questions ascertained module coverage of domains. If covered (yes), a free text question obtained more detail. The questionnaire was provided to module coordinators alongside rationale and the AIDCF. Submitted data were automatically collected into a Microsoft Excel workbook. Concordance analysis was undertaken by the primary researcher (HS), who verified free-text responses for agreement with the coordinator’s yes/no selection. The research lead (DC) accuracy checked 10% of processed data. A module that mapped to ≥1 relevant capability statement(s) was counted as mapping to the whole domain. Data were sense-checked by the Director of Education (LH). Discrepancies were resolved through a consensus discussion with another reviewer (MH) and the dataset finalised. Results Fig. 1 shows alignment to the AIDCF (and an example of a mapped activity) with alignment seen across all domains. Lowest levels of alignment were supporting problem solving in practice (Domain 5.3) and leadership within organisation (Domain 2.2). Conclusion The current substantial alignment with the AIDCF is encouraging to QUB educators. While changes will be made to address the low prevalence of problem solving, the organisational leadership domain is of lower implementation priority. The approach taken was a strength (in comparison to simply reviewing data from top line programme documentation). Limitations centre on the ‘meeting’ of a domain being subjective. Other organisations with pharmacy training responsibilities should conduct similar exercises to ensure digital development needs of their workforces are met.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Published
2026-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riag034.054
Primary Topic
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using a questionnaire-based approach to determine alignment of a digital capability framework for health and social care to the MPharm degree programme at Queen’s University Belfast

Maurice Hall, L-A. Hanna, D Corbett, H Sloss
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
article

Using a questionnaire-based approach to determine alignment of a digital capability framework for health and social care to the MPharm degree programme at Queen’s University Belfast

Maurice Hall, L-A. Hanna, D Corbett, H Sloss
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The All-Ireland Digital Capability Framework (AIDCF) for Health and Social Care has been developed given the need for healthcare professionals to demonstrate appropriate levels of digital competency across multiple domains of their practice.[1] Moreover, the 2021 Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists require students to use ‘digital technologies to improve clinical outcomes.’[2] As there is no national digital capability syllabus for MPharm programmes, it is important to compare our content to the AIDCF. Aim To map the AIDCF to the Queen’s University Belfast (QUB) MPharm Degree Programme, ascertaining alignment, and enabling relevant gaps to be identified and quantified. Methods AIDCF[1] domains were redesigned into a questionnaire without changing wording. Yes/no questions ascertained module coverage of domains. If covered (yes), a free text question obtained more detail. The questionnaire was provided to module coordinators alongside rationale and the AIDCF. Submitted data were automatically collected into a Microsoft Excel workbook. Concordance analysis was undertaken by the primary researcher (HS), who verified free-text responses for agreement with the coordinator’s yes/no selection. The research lead (DC) accuracy checked 10% of processed data. A module that mapped to ≥1 relevant capability statement(s) was counted as mapping to the whole domain. Data were sense-checked by the Director of Education (LH). Discrepancies were resolved through a consensus discussion with another reviewer (MH) and the dataset finalised. Results Fig. 1 shows alignment to the AIDCF (and an example of a mapped activity) with alignment seen across all domains. Lowest levels of alignment were supporting problem solving in practice (Domain 5.3) and leadership within organisation (Domain 2.2). Conclusion The current substantial alignment with the AIDCF is encouraging to QUB educators. While changes will be made to address the low prevalence of problem solving, the organisational leadership domain is of lower implementation priority. The approach taken was a strength (in comparison to simply reviewing data from top line programme documentation). Limitations centre on the ‘meeting’ of a domain being subjective. Other organisations with pharmacy training responsibilities should conduct similar exercises to ensure digital development needs of their workforces are met.

International Journal of Pharmacy PracticeVol. 34(Supplement_1)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.