The SAFE-study: comparative treatment effect, side effect and health evaluation of allopathic versus ayurvedic treatments for major depressive disorder: a naturalistic real-world study

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition with diverse treatment modalities. There is an unmet need in the treatment of major psychiatric disorders such as depression and naturalistic treatment options which are desirable particularly for chronic and severe courses of mental illness. In addition, there is an evidence gap for naturalistic treatment options for depression. This study compares the treatment effects and side effects of allopathic and ayurvedic treatments for MDD within a real-world setting. Allopathic approaches typically involve antidepressants and psychotherapy, while ayurvedic treatments may encompass herbal remedies, panchakarma, manual therapies, dietary modifications, yoga, meditation and lifestyle interventions. Methods: This six-month, naturalistic observational study will involve 105 adult participants (18-65 years) diagnosed with MDD according to DSM-5 criteria. Participants will be categorized to one of three groups: allopathic-only treatment (n=35), ayurvedic-only treatment (n=35), or a combination of both (n=35). Depressive symptom severity will be assessed as primary endpoint using primarily the MDRS, and secondarily HAMD and PHQ-9 scales at baseline, every 2 weeks until week 8, followed by monthly assessments until months 6. Secondary outcomes will exploratively include side effects (UKU, GASE, MARS), quality of life and daily functioning (WHOQoL-BREF, GAF, FAST) as well as general health measures (e.g. lab tests). Results: The study will compare changes in primary and secondary outcome measures across the three treatment groups over time (baseline vs. week 8, month 3 and month 6) using appropriate statistical models for longitudinal data (e.g., repeated measures ANOVA, mixed-effects models. Conclusions: This study will provide valuable real-world evidence on the comparative treatment effects and side effects of allopathic and ayurvedic treatments for MDD, informing clinical practice and future research directions in this area. Findings will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of treatment options for individuals with MDD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1719639
Primary Topic
Treatment of Major Depression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The SAFE-study: comparative treatment effect, side effect and health evaluation of allopathic versus ayurvedic treatments for major depressive disorder: a naturalistic real-world study

Manishkumar Patel, Mansi Patel, Jagdish Varma, Anusha Prabhakaran et al.
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Treatment of Major Depression
article

The SAFE-study: comparative treatment effect, side effect and health evaluation of allopathic versus ayurvedic treatments for major depressive disorder: a naturalistic real-world study

Manishkumar Patel, Mansi Patel, Jagdish Varma, Anusha Prabhakaran, Shivenarain Gupta, B. T. Baune, Sarah Elisabeth Fromme Grübel
article en

Abstract

Background: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a prevalent mental health condition with diverse treatment modalities. There is an unmet need in the treatment of major psychiatric disorders such as depression and naturalistic treatment options which are desirable particularly for chronic and severe courses of mental illness. In addition, there is an evidence gap for naturalistic treatment options for depression. This study compares the treatment effects and side effects of allopathic and ayurvedic treatments for MDD within a real-world setting. Allopathic approaches typically involve antidepressants and psychotherapy, while ayurvedic treatments may encompass herbal remedies, panchakarma, manual therapies, dietary modifications, yoga, meditation and lifestyle interventions. Methods: This six-month, naturalistic observational study will involve 105 adult participants (18-65 years) diagnosed with MDD according to DSM-5 criteria. Participants will be categorized to one of three groups: allopathic-only treatment (n=35), ayurvedic-only treatment (n=35), or a combination of both (n=35). Depressive symptom severity will be assessed as primary endpoint using primarily the MDRS, and secondarily HAMD and PHQ-9 scales at baseline, every 2 weeks until week 8, followed by monthly assessments until months 6. Secondary outcomes will exploratively include side effects (UKU, GASE, MARS), quality of life and daily functioning (WHOQoL-BREF, GAF, FAST) as well as general health measures (e.g. lab tests). Results: The study will compare changes in primary and secondary outcome measures across the three treatment groups over time (baseline vs. week 8, month 3 and month 6) using appropriate statistical models for longitudinal data (e.g., repeated measures ANOVA, mixed-effects models. Conclusions: This study will provide valuable real-world evidence on the comparative treatment effects and side effects of allopathic and ayurvedic treatments for MDD, informing clinical practice and future research directions in this area. Findings will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of treatment options for individuals with MDD.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
University of Münster (DE), Pramukhswami Medical College (IN), University of Aden (YE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Treatment of Major Depression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.