CORRELATION BETWEEN THE GIBBONS–HAWKING EUCLIDEAN FORMALISM AND THE CLOSURE OF SINGULARITIES AND INFINITIES IN THE VP HYPOTHESIS: a critical–propositional confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

This article presents a critical–propositional confrontation between Darius Kazlauskas’s Correlation of the Gibbons–Hawking 1977 Euclidean Action Formalism with the Closure of Singularities and Infinities in the VP Hypothesis (Version V01) and the Theory of Objectivity (TO), as developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines whether the VP hypothesis, in linking the finiteness of the Euclidean action to a regular interior core and to asymptotic subtraction, can be interpreted as a formally relevant framework for the closure of singularities and infinities. The paper argues that Kazlauskas’s proposal shows meaningful compatibilities with the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding the necessity of boundaries, the discipline of closure, the refusal of absolute singularities as final physical entities, and the dependence of exterior phenomenic regimes on deeper constitutive layers. At the same time, the article identifies important tensions, including the insufficient distinction between physical infinity and logical infinity, the lack of a fully explicit modal ontology, and the limited role of relational observation in the VP framework. By articulating the analyzed article with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal and testability-oriented developments, and a broader bibliography of dialogue with modern physics, this study proposes that the VP hypothesis can be received as a formally significant but ontologically incomplete program of constitutive closure. The article concludes that the Gibbons–Hawking result, within the VP scheme, may be read as a special exterior limit of a broader structure, but one that still requires ontological reclassification under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. This analytical article also includes an appendix in TO style, offering a modal reordering of the central concepts of the VP hypothesis. Note: This analysis was developed with the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; VP Hypothesis; Gibbons–Hawking; Euclidean Action; Quantum Gravity; Singularities; Infinities; Modal Ontology; Cosmology; Boundary Conditions; Gravitational Thermodynamics; Critical-Propositional Analysis.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19560714
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CORRELATION BETWEEN THE GIBBONS–HAWKING EUCLIDEAN FORMALISM AND THE CLOSURE OF SINGULARITIES AND INFINITIES IN THE VP HYPOTHESIS: a critical–propositional confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
article

CORRELATION BETWEEN THE GIBBONS–HAWKING EUCLIDEAN FORMALISM AND THE CLOSURE OF SINGULARITIES AND INFINITIES IN THE VP HYPOTHESIS: a critical–propositional confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional confrontation between Darius Kazlauskas’s Correlation of the Gibbons–Hawking 1977 Euclidean Action Formalism with the Closure of Singularities and Infinities in the VP Hypothesis (Version V01) and the Theory of Objectivity (TO), as developed by Vidamor Cabannas and Denivaldo Silva. The study examines whether the VP hypothesis, in linking the finiteness of the Euclidean action to a regular interior core and to asymptotic subtraction, can be interpreted as a formally relevant framework for the closure of singularities and infinities. The paper argues that Kazlauskas’s proposal shows meaningful compatibilities with the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding the necessity of boundaries, the discipline of closure, the refusal of absolute singularities as final physical entities, and the dependence of exterior phenomenic regimes on deeper constitutive layers. At the same time, the article identifies important tensions, including the insufficient distinction between physical infinity and logical infinity, the lack of a fully explicit modal ontology, and the limited role of relational observation in the VP framework. By articulating the analyzed article with the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent modal and testability-oriented developments, and a broader bibliography of dialogue with modern physics, this study proposes that the VP hypothesis can be received as a formally significant but ontologically incomplete program of constitutive closure. The article concludes that the Gibbons–Hawking result, within the VP scheme, may be read as a special exterior limit of a broader structure, but one that still requires ontological reclassification under the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. This analytical article also includes an appendix in TO style, offering a modal reordering of the central concepts of the VP hypothesis. Note: This analysis was developed with the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Objectivity; VP Hypothesis; Gibbons–Hawking; Euclidean Action; Quantum Gravity; Singularities; Infinities; Modal Ontology; Cosmology; Boundary Conditions; Gravitational Thermodynamics; Critical-Propositional Analysis.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.