Assessing the CO2-prediction equation used in association with sniffers to estimate daily methane emissions in dairy cows with different feed efficiencies

Absolute methane (CH4) production (g/d) from sniffer systems can be estimated by multiplying the measured CH4 to carbon dioxide (CO2) ratio with predicted CO2 output (g/d) based on body weight and energy-corrected milk yield. However, this method may introduce bias in CO2 prediction due to differences in energy use efficiency, affecting CH4 estimates. Using respiration chamber data from 1,060 individual records across 37 studies, we simulated CH4 predicted from sniffers to examine the relationship of CH4 and CO2 estimates with feed efficiency, categorized by residual feed intake (RFI). Carbon dioxide production was overestimated in the low-RFI (efficient) cows (12.2 vs. 11.6 kg/d) and underpredicted in the high-RFI (inefficient) cows (12.3 vs. 13.4 kg/d). Consequently, CH4 emissions were overpredicted in efficient cows (380 vs. 362 g/d) and underpredicted in inefficient cows (384 vs. 419 g/d; P < 0.01). When cows were grouped by CH4 prediction error, observed CH4 emissions and yields increased across error groups, while predicted values showed the opposite trend (P < 0.01). These results indicate that CH4 estimates based on predicted CO2 may be systematically biased, which could affect animal ranking and genetic progress if used in selection indices without adjusting for feed intake or efficiency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Published
2026-04-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2025-0103
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the CO2-prediction equation used in association with sniffers to estimate daily methane emissions in dairy cows with different feed efficiencies

Angela Schwarm, Puchun Niu, Abdulai Guinguina, P. Huhtanen et al.
Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Assessing the CO2-prediction equation used in association with sniffers to estimate daily methane emissions in dairy cows with different feed efficiencies

Angela Schwarm, Puchun Niu, Abdulai Guinguina, P. Huhtanen, Ali-Reza Bayat, Vinícius Carneiro de Souza, T. Yan, P. Lund, Michael Kreuzer, Ermias Kebreab
article en

Abstract

Absolute methane (CH4) production (g/d) from sniffer systems can be estimated by multiplying the measured CH4 to carbon dioxide (CO2) ratio with predicted CO2 output (g/d) based on body weight and energy-corrected milk yield. However, this method may introduce bias in CO2 prediction due to differences in energy use efficiency, affecting CH4 estimates. Using respiration chamber data from 1,060 individual records across 37 studies, we simulated CH4 predicted from sniffers to examine the relationship of CH4 and CO2 estimates with feed efficiency, categorized by residual feed intake (RFI). Carbon dioxide production was overestimated in the low-RFI (efficient) cows (12.2 vs. 11.6 kg/d) and underpredicted in the high-RFI (inefficient) cows (12.3 vs. 13.4 kg/d). Consequently, CH4 emissions were overpredicted in efficient cows (380 vs. 362 g/d) and underpredicted in inefficient cows (384 vs. 419 g/d; P < 0.01). When cows were grouped by CH4 prediction error, observed CH4 emissions and yields increased across error groups, while predicted values showed the opposite trend (P < 0.01). These results indicate that CH4 estimates based on predicted CO2 may be systematically biased, which could affect animal ranking and genetic progress if used in selection indices without adjusting for feed intake or efficiency.

Canadian Journal of Animal Science
Animal Welfare Institute (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Aarhus University (DK), Cornell University (US), Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), Natural Resources Institute Finland (FI), ETH Zurich (CH), Microsoft (Brazil) (BR), Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Agri Food and Biosciences Institute (GB), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO), University of California, Davis (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.