Corporate Dentistry in the European Union: Legal Frameworks and Structural Characteristics.

Introduction And Aims The aim of this study was to collect and analyze country-specific information on corporate dental chains in the European Union, with a particular focus on their prevalence, organizational structures, business models, and legal frameworks, as well as the role of national dental associations and chambers in this context. Methods A standardized questionnaire developed by the Council of European Dentists (CED) was distributed to its national dental associations from EU member states, Iceland, Norway, the United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland, and Switzerland. Results The response rate was 86.6% (26/30). In 22 countries (84.6%), non-dentists can own a dental practice; 4 countries prohibit such ownership. Dental chains are permitted in 24 (92.3%) and present in 21 countries (80.7%). In 9 countries (34.6%), dental chains not exclusively owned by dentists must include a dentist in management. Since 2018, 11 countries (42.3%) report an increase of dentists working in chains, while 5 (19.2%) observed no change. Dental chains mainly operate in large cities (n = 12; 46.2%). Their preferred models are opening new practices (n = 9; 34.6%) or acquiring existing ones (n = 8; 30.8%). Unethical conduct toward patients by dental chains was observed in 5 countries (19.2%), while 6 countries (23.1%) reported unsatisfactory, poor working conditions and employment contracts for dentists. Conclusion The European dental care sector is undergoing structural transformation. While dental chains are permitted in most countries, legal clarity and professional oversight remain limited. Reports of unethical conduct and inadequate working conditions highlight the need for further research. Clinical Relevance The increasing presence of dental chains in Europe highlights regulatory gaps and ethical concerns. This study emphasizes the importance of clear legal frameworks and professional oversight to maintain high standards in patient care, particularly as market-driven models reshape dental service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/96859
Primary Topic
Dental Education, Practice, Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Dentistry in the European Union: Legal Frameworks and Structural Characteristics.

Elisabeth Scarpello, Simona Dianišková, Oliver Zeyer, Thomas Gerhard Wolf et al.
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Dental Education, Practice, Research
article

Corporate Dentistry in the European Union: Legal Frameworks and Structural Characteristics.

Elisabeth Scarpello, Simona Dianišková, Oliver Zeyer, Thomas Gerhard Wolf, Nikoleta Arnaudova, Freddie Sloth-Lisbjerg, Alfred Büttner, Svea Berchtold, Anna Lella
article en

Abstract

Introduction And Aims The aim of this study was to collect and analyze country-specific information on corporate dental chains in the European Union, with a particular focus on their prevalence, organizational structures, business models, and legal frameworks, as well as the role of national dental associations and chambers in this context. Methods A standardized questionnaire developed by the Council of European Dentists (CED) was distributed to its national dental associations from EU member states, Iceland, Norway, the United Kingdom of Great Britian and Northern Ireland, and Switzerland. Results The response rate was 86.6% (26/30). In 22 countries (84.6%), non-dentists can own a dental practice; 4 countries prohibit such ownership. Dental chains are permitted in 24 (92.3%) and present in 21 countries (80.7%). In 9 countries (34.6%), dental chains not exclusively owned by dentists must include a dentist in management. Since 2018, 11 countries (42.3%) report an increase of dentists working in chains, while 5 (19.2%) observed no change. Dental chains mainly operate in large cities (n = 12; 46.2%). Their preferred models are opening new practices (n = 9; 34.6%) or acquiring existing ones (n = 8; 30.8%). Unethical conduct toward patients by dental chains was observed in 5 countries (19.2%), while 6 countries (23.1%) reported unsatisfactory, poor working conditions and employment contracts for dentists. Conclusion The European dental care sector is undergoing structural transformation. While dental chains are permitted in most countries, legal clarity and professional oversight remain limited. Reports of unethical conduct and inadequate working conditions highlight the need for further research. Clinical Relevance The increasing presence of dental chains in Europe highlights regulatory gaps and ethical concerns. This study emphasizes the importance of clear legal frameworks and professional oversight to maintain high standards in patient care, particularly as market-driven models reshape dental service delivery.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Dental Education, Practice, Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.