Rethinking flood resilience: systemic risk, governance failures, and the social production of vulnerability in the Himalayan–Indus region

Flood disasters in the Himalayan-Indus Basin are increasing in frequency, scale, and impact, driven by glacial melt, erratic monsoons, and changing land-use patterns. Yet their effects are unevenly distributed, and their causes extend beyond climatic or environmental factors. Using the 2022 Pakistan floods as a case study, this paper argues that such disasters are not isolated anomalies but emerge from the intersection of climate extremes, systemic risk, social vulnerability, and governance failure. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in disaster studies, hydropolitics, and critical development, this study employs a qualitative, exploratory research design, analysing published papers, technical and policy reports, and grey literature. A critical social science perspective frames the analysis, highlighting how historical and political processes-including colonial-era infrastructure, socio-political exclusion, and institutional dysfunction-have produced and distributed systemic flood risk in Pakistan. We argue that flood crises stem not only from climate extremes but are systemically produced by historical and political processes, shaped by intersecting hierarchies of social, economic, and political marginalization. The paper critiques dominant hazard-centric and technocratic responses and calls for reimagining resilience as a transformative process-one that involves overhauling governance, dismantling exclusion, rebuilding socio-ecological relations, and embedding equity and justice in disaster risk strategies. The paper advocates for just, participatory, and ecologically grounded approaches to resilience. While focused on Pakistan, the findings offer broader insights for understanding and addressing systemic flood risk across the Himalayan-Indus region and comparable climate-vulnerable contexts. The paper contributes to ongoing debates on disaster governance and resilience in climate-vulnerable regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Published
2026-04-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44367-026-00032-8
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking flood resilience: systemic risk, governance failures, and the social production of vulnerability in the Himalayan–Indus region

Jouni Paavola, Abdur Rahim Hamidi, Paula Novo, Ishfaq Hussain Malik et al.
Journal of Disaster Science and Management
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Rethinking flood resilience: systemic risk, governance failures, and the social production of vulnerability in the Himalayan–Indus region

Jouni Paavola, Abdur Rahim Hamidi, Paula Novo, Ishfaq Hussain Malik, James D. Ford
article en

Abstract

Flood disasters in the Himalayan-Indus Basin are increasing in frequency, scale, and impact, driven by glacial melt, erratic monsoons, and changing land-use patterns. Yet their effects are unevenly distributed, and their causes extend beyond climatic or environmental factors. Using the 2022 Pakistan floods as a case study, this paper argues that such disasters are not isolated anomalies but emerge from the intersection of climate extremes, systemic risk, social vulnerability, and governance failure. Drawing on interdisciplinary scholarship in disaster studies, hydropolitics, and critical development, this study employs a qualitative, exploratory research design, analysing published papers, technical and policy reports, and grey literature. A critical social science perspective frames the analysis, highlighting how historical and political processes-including colonial-era infrastructure, socio-political exclusion, and institutional dysfunction-have produced and distributed systemic flood risk in Pakistan. We argue that flood crises stem not only from climate extremes but are systemically produced by historical and political processes, shaped by intersecting hierarchies of social, economic, and political marginalization. The paper critiques dominant hazard-centric and technocratic responses and calls for reimagining resilience as a transformative process-one that involves overhauling governance, dismantling exclusion, rebuilding socio-ecological relations, and embedding equity and justice in disaster risk strategies. The paper advocates for just, participatory, and ecologically grounded approaches to resilience. While focused on Pakistan, the findings offer broader insights for understanding and addressing systemic flood risk across the Himalayan-Indus region and comparable climate-vulnerable contexts. The paper contributes to ongoing debates on disaster governance and resilience in climate-vulnerable regions.

Journal of Disaster Science and ManagementVol. 2(1)
University of Bern (CH), University of Leeds (GB), Sustainability Institute (ZA)
Economic and Social Research Council
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.