Responsive Architecture and Fire Safety: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Regimes in the USA, Asia, and the EU/UK, with Implications for Poland in the Context of BIM/DT/AI/IoT

This article compares selected fire safety regulatory systems in Japan, China, the United States, and the EU/UK, interpreted through the lens of responsive architecture and the implementation of digital technologies—building information modelling (BIM), digital twins (DTs), artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT). The study adopts a qualitative approach based on a structured review of legal acts, technical standards, public-sector reports, and the scientific and professional literature, organised using a common analytical framework. First, the analysis identifies shared foundations across regimes: the primacy of life safety, mandatory detection and alarm functions, fire compartmentation, requirements for protected means of exit, and the increasing importance of documenting the operational status of protection measures. Then, it contrasts key differences, including the permissibility of performance-based design (PBD), the degree to which digital documentation is formally recognised, organisational enforcement models, and cybersecurity approaches for integrated fire alarm/voice alarm/building management/IoT ecosystems. Japan and selected Chinese cities combine stringent requirements with openness to dynamic solutions and urban-scale data platforms. The USA relies on a decentralised code-based ecosystem with a strong role for professional and industry bodies, while the EU/UK continues to strengthen harmonised standards and digital building registers, reinforced by lessons after the Grenfell Tower fire. Against this background, Poland is discussed as broadly aligned in goals and baseline technical requirements yet lagging behind in implementing PBD pathways, digital registers, formal BIM/DT integration, and minimum cybersecurity requirements. The proposed directions for change aim to create a more predictable regulatory and technical framework for the development of responsive architecture and dynamic fire safety systems in Poland. The study contributes to the sustainability literature by framing regulatory readiness for digital fire safety as a lifecycle resilience strategy, directly relevant to safe, resource-efficient, and inclusive built environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-04-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083808
Primary Topic
BIM and Construction Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsive Architecture and Fire Safety: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Regimes in the USA, Asia, and the EU/UK, with Implications for Poland in the Context of BIM/DT/AI/IoT

Wojciech Bonenberg, Roman Pilch, Przemysław Konopski
Sustainability
BIM and Construction Integration
article

Responsive Architecture and Fire Safety: A Comparative Review of Regulatory Regimes in the USA, Asia, and the EU/UK, with Implications for Poland in the Context of BIM/DT/AI/IoT

Wojciech Bonenberg, Roman Pilch, Przemysław Konopski
article en

Abstract

This article compares selected fire safety regulatory systems in Japan, China, the United States, and the EU/UK, interpreted through the lens of responsive architecture and the implementation of digital technologies—building information modelling (BIM), digital twins (DTs), artificial intelligence (AI), and the Internet of Things (IoT). The study adopts a qualitative approach based on a structured review of legal acts, technical standards, public-sector reports, and the scientific and professional literature, organised using a common analytical framework. First, the analysis identifies shared foundations across regimes: the primacy of life safety, mandatory detection and alarm functions, fire compartmentation, requirements for protected means of exit, and the increasing importance of documenting the operational status of protection measures. Then, it contrasts key differences, including the permissibility of performance-based design (PBD), the degree to which digital documentation is formally recognised, organisational enforcement models, and cybersecurity approaches for integrated fire alarm/voice alarm/building management/IoT ecosystems. Japan and selected Chinese cities combine stringent requirements with openness to dynamic solutions and urban-scale data platforms. The USA relies on a decentralised code-based ecosystem with a strong role for professional and industry bodies, while the EU/UK continues to strengthen harmonised standards and digital building registers, reinforced by lessons after the Grenfell Tower fire. Against this background, Poland is discussed as broadly aligned in goals and baseline technical requirements yet lagging behind in implementing PBD pathways, digital registers, formal BIM/DT integration, and minimum cybersecurity requirements. The proposed directions for change aim to create a more predictable regulatory and technical framework for the development of responsive architecture and dynamic fire safety systems in Poland. The study contributes to the sustainability literature by framing regulatory readiness for digital fire safety as a lifecycle resilience strategy, directly relevant to safe, resource-efficient, and inclusive built environments.

SustainabilityVol. 18(8)
Wrocław University of Science and Technology (PL), Łódź Film School (PL), Poznań University of Technology (PL), AGH University of Krakow (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
BIM and Construction Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.